[Qgis-psc] Commit rights for Vincent Cloarec

Vincent Cloarec vcloarec at gmail.com
Mon May 18 09:57:18 PDT 2020


Dear all,

Thanks for considering me to participate in the bug fixing. But there are
already a long list of mesh and temporal tickets which I am going to handle
(funded through other projects). But, I'd be happy to join the effort in
future, helping my colleagues, other devs and QGIS!

Regards.

Vincent

Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 12:22, ElPaso <elpaso at itopen.it> a écrit :

> Il 18/05/20 18:08, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
> > I am talking about the 3.14 bug fixing round, starting now and until
> > June 19.
>
>
> Hi, just a side note to say that in the past paid bug fixing round there
> were developers with a very short QGIS experience and 0 volunteer
> history (AFAIK) and no commit rights.
>
> I don't think that having commit rights was a requirement.
>
>
> We should probably talk about this.
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
> >
> > I didn't get confirmation from Vincent that he would be available for
> > sure, but Peter, his colleague mentioned that he might, but due to his
> > committer state probably can't be be considered yet.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > Am 18.05.20 um 18:00 schrieb Marco Bernasocchi:
> >> Hi Andreas
> >>
> >> On 18.05.20 17:56, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> >>> Are you referring to
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2020-May/008763.html ?
> >> Yes exactly
> >>> So basically you would propose that not the PSC decides about this,
> >>> but the existing core committers - right? Would be fine with me. But
> >>> it is still the PSC that should prepare the process for the voting, I
> >>> think.
> >> absolutely, my point is that we should define how the process is. We as
> >> PSC do not need to _be_ the process, but we do need to make clear how
> >> things are done.
> >>> Also, I agree that core committers from the same company /
> >>> organization should abstain from voting.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and greetings,
> >> For wich bugfixing round were you considering Vincent for? do we need an
> >> ad hoc meeting to get all going quicker or can we wait until June the
> >> 2nd?
> >>> Andreas
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Marco
> >>
> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 17:15 schrieb Andreas Neumann:
> >>>> Dear PSC members,
> >>>>
> >>>> Could we have some progress relating
> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2020-May/008761.html ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I am investigating the potential contributors in the current bug
> >>>> fixing effort, and Vincent would be a candidate, if he could be a
> >>>> core developer with commit rights.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Andreas
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
> --
> Alessandro Pasotti
> w3: www.itopen.it
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200518/53b57b34/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list