[Qgis-psc] QGIS server certified for OGC API for features

Fri Oct 23 07:49:31 PDT 2020

Hi all,

I also think that we should ask them to give either a substantial discount
(because we are an OS project) or we cancel our certification.

This year we can pay the invoice. Please tell them to update the address to:

QGIS.ORG
Boeschacherstrase 10A
8624 Gruet (Gossau ZH)
Switzerland

Note that I replaced the german Umlauts. Most likely, if it is is a US
based entity, they are not capable of handling foreign characters ...

What is the rest of the PSC thinking about OGC certification?

Greetings,
Andreas

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 15:14, Alessandro Pasotti <apasotti at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 2:25 PM Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > any reaction here?
> > At least Andreas, can I go further with the billing or should I fight a
> bit more with the OGC ?
>
> Hi Régis,
>
> It looks like wasted time fighting bureaucrats.
>
> I say we pay now and never again.
>
>
> >
> > regards
> > Régis
> >
> > Le jeu. 22 oct. 2020 à 15:09, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
> >>
> >> Okay,
> >> so the bad news is that OGC seems to have stricter rules than before.
> See the response below.
> >>
> >> We are now submitted to fees, which are 300 euros per certification
> submission.
> >> Currently we have 2 services only, for the server, WMS 1.3 and OGCAPI,
> so this is 600 euros per year.
> >>
> >> I suppose we will have to pay for this one, since the job is done. I'll
> ask them to emit a correct invoice with QGIS.org information and adress.
> >>
> >> This opens a question for our certification strategy:
> >>
> >> Up to now it only involved some volunteer time. Now it would also
> involve finances.
> >> In my thoughts, the ideal situation was to certify all the supported
> services, either on server and client side.
> >> If we go this way, this will grow very fast to some thousand euros each
> year and a lot of manual work. This seems overkill to me when thinking of
> the benefits of thess certifications. I never answered any bid requiring a
> certified engine yet - but you might have hit this issue before.
> >>
> >> I'm wondering if we shouldn't just ask for certification once per
> service, just to prove QGIS is officially compliant once, and then let our
> nightly testing platforms "prove" we are compliant on the long run.
> >>
> >> Instead of a recurrent charge,  this will be a one time charge only,
> when needed, and when we want to make some buzz in this area.
> >>
> >> @Andreas, is this ok for the 300 euros bill, even if this was not
> planned?
> >>
> >> @all any thoughts about our certification strategy?
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Régis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 22/10/2020 11:25, Gobe Hobona wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Régis,
> >>>
> >>> We appreciate the work done by the QGIS and OSGeo community in
> supporting OGC standards. Please note however that we are guided by our
> policies, agreed on by the OGC Membership.
> >>>
> >>> Please see Sections 5.5 and 6.3 of the Compliance Testing Policy [
> https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=55234].
> >>>
> >>> The fee is only waived for:
> >>>
> >>> * The first three implementations to pass 100% of the compliance
> procedure, while the test is in beta. We refer to these as Early
> Implementers.
> >>> * The first two Reference Implementations that pass the test related
> to a conformance class within a version of an Implementation Standard.
> >>>
> >>> In this case, the executable test suite of OGC API - Features - Part
> 1: Core is already in production (i.e. it is no longer in beta).  Please
> also note that there are already two current Reference Implementations of
> the standard.
> >>>
> >>>
> https://www.ogc.org/resource/products/compliant?display_opt=1&specid=1022
> >>>
> >>> QGIS Server is therefore not eligible for the fee waiver for
> compliance certification for OGC API - Features - Part 1: Core.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Gobe
> >>
> >>
> >> Le jeu. 22 oct. 2020 à 10:23, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Ouch, in the meantime, I saw they are trying to charge us for this.
> >>> I'm negotiating a free of charge policy, like they did with the
> previous OGC team.
> >>> I'll keep you posted.
> >>>
> >>> Régis
> >>>
> >>> Le jeu. 22 oct. 2020 à 10:14, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>> Thanks to the great work of Paul and Alessandro, I finally managed to
> get QGIS server 3.10 certified for OGC API for Features (aka WFS3).
> >>>>
> >>>> The badge is at [0] and I updated the wiki accordingly [1]
> >>>>
> >>>> Next steps for me are :
> >>>>
> >>>> - push a blog post to QGIS.org website
> >>>> - push a news in the QGIS feed (I'm unsure about this, any opinion
> welcome)
> >>>> - update the documentation
> >>>>
> >>>> I am really looking forward to the transactional WFS3 specification
> [2], this will be a big win over current WFS-T for our web clients \o/
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards
> >>>> Régis
> >>>>
> >>>> [0] https://www.ogc.org/resource/products/details/?pid=1611
> >>>> [1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/OGC-compliance-for-QGIS
> >>>> [2] http://docs.opengeospatial.org/DRAFTS/20-002.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 21/10/2020 19:56, Catherine Walline wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Régis and Andreas,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you for your patience regarding the recent submission for OGC
> compliance for QGIS Server 3.10 with OGC API Features 1.0. It has been
> approved for the period from 21 October 2020 through 3 April 2021, to
> coincide with the existing compliance period. The corresponding prorated
> invoice is attached.
> >>>>
> >>>> We invite you to visit the public website to confirm that the
> listings are displayed as intended:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.ogc.org/resource/products/details/?pid=1611
> >>>>
> >>>> We greatly appreciate your participation in OGC compliance. Please
> let me know if there are any questions or concerns.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best wishes,
> >>>>
> >>>> Catherine
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Catherine Walline
> >>>> Senior Accountant | Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
> >>>> Office: 1-508-655-5858, ext 707
> >>>> cwalline at ogc.org | ogc.org | @opengeospatial
> >>>>
> >>>> Sign up for OGC News
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> --
> Alessandro Pasotti
> QCooperative:  www.qcooperative.net
> ItOpen:   www.itopen.it
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20201023/81d583bf/attachment.html>