[Qgis-psc] Questions about QGIS API licensing for a company internal use only

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Wed Dec 8 20:30:08 PST 2021


What is the problem with GPL, if you're not going to distribute it?
Cheers.

Il 9 dicembre 2021 01:40:24 EET, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 06:25, Rafael Abrantes Machado
><rafael.a.machado at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I would like to make sure if we could use QGIS C++ API in our
>software, which is not (and cannot be) GPLv2, but it is for internal
>use only (will never be distributed).
>>
>> I read a lot about licensing and it seems to me that this would be an
>acceptable scenario but I thought it would be better to check with a
>formal QGIS channel.
>
>No, this is NOT a legal use of the QGIS libraries. Regardless of how
>you use or distribute your software it must still use a GPLv2 or later
>compatible licence.
>
>Nyall
>
>
>
>>
>> Is this mailing list the right channel to post this question? If it's
>not, I apologize and ask if someone can guide me to the right channel?
>>
>> I can provide many more details, if this is the right place.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Rafael Abrantes Machado
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>_______________________________________________
>Qgis-psc mailing list
>Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-- 
Sorry for being short
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20211209/c971edc3/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list