[Qgis-psc] Rethink using github discussions?

[Anita Graser]

+1 to close

Anita

On 08.02.2021 10:00, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
> +1 to close
> not much more to add to the discussion on my side, arguments raised by
> the others are quite clear to me.
>
> Le lun. 8 févr. 2021 à 09:16, Richard Duivenvoorde
> <rdmailings at duif.net <mailto:rdmailings at duif.net>> a écrit :
>
>     On 2/8/21 12:20 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>     > Hi PSC!
>     >
>     > I'd like to raise discussions about whether or not it's a good
>     move to
>     > be allowing the github discussions feature on the QGIS repo:
>     >
>     > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/discussions
>     <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/discussions>
>
>     If I may ask another argument against it: it is binding us more to
>     github, while one of the idea's is/was to be able to move (or at
>     least keep the window open) to a more 'free' issue tracker if
>     needed/wanted.
>
>     Adding: it's yet another communication channel added to our
>     already long list.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Richard Duivenvoorde
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20210208/2ad427d6/attachment-0001.html>