[Qgis-psc] How to handle upstream Qt fixes
Ludovic Hirlimann
lhirlimann at 3liz.com
Fri Sep 3 23:45:19 PDT 2021
On 9/3/21 00:46, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Hi PSC, devs,
>
> I'd like to kick start some discussion on how best to handle the
> situation with upstream Qt and their (lack of) support for Qt 5. As a
> quick summary of the situation:
>
> - Qt Co effectively ended open source support of Qt 5 at the 5.15.2
> release, and have moved all focus to Qt 6.
> - While some preliminary work has been done, QGIS doesn't currently
> support Qt 6 based builds, and likely won't be ready for this for some
> time (even completely ignoring all the stable API questions a Qt 6
> build raises entirely!)
Wouldn't it be wiser to devote resources to moving to QT6 and do that
faster than
wait on potential unsuported 5x fixes ?
Ludovic
--
Administrateur Système Chez 3liz
https://3liz.com solutions libre de Cartographie
Système d'information Géographique // Developement QGIS
Editeur de lizmap -> https://lizmap.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20210904/2ae5eeae/attachment.sig>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list