[Qgis-psc] CI port to 22.04 - complete!
Julien Cabieces
julien.cabieces at oslandia.com
Thu Aug 11 12:59:18 PDT 2022
I think they use the CDash server for their own purpose, but I can inform them. FYI, I
opened a ticket when CDash was down a few month ago
https://forum.orfeo-toolbox.org/
But we are still pushing on their server, so if we agree to get rid of
CDash, we need to remove the cdash push.
Regards,
Julien
> By the way, anyone has a contact with orfeotoolbox team? We could inform
> them they can recycle this server to some other usage.
> Cheers
> Régis
>
> Le jeu. 11 août 2022 à 15:23, Julien Cabieces <julien.cabieces at oslandia.com>
> a écrit :
>
>>
>> Hi Nyall,
>>
>> Great thank you for this work!!
>>
>> And more particularly for removing the cdash reliance on cdash
>> orfeotoolbox server! I really love the new HTML image actual/expected
>> report
>> with images on the same line and the vertical slider to quickly switch
>> between actual/expected. It really ease issues identification.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> > Hi PSC,
>> >
>> > Just reporting back that I've finished porting the CI setup to 22.04
>> > (for master at least, the backports are still being worked through the
>> > queue).
>> >
>> > In the end this work involved both a lot of fixes to individual tests
>> > to reflect changed behaviour in newer GEOS/GDAL/Qt versions, plus a
>> > fair amount of actual bugs fixed in QGIS which were only revealed on
>> > the newer libraries.
>> >
>> > Here's a quick (non-exhaustive) summary of the actual fixes made
>> > during this work:
>> >
>> > - Fixed a crash in the rule based renderer (this one has been plaguing
>> > us for a looong time -- it had previously been written off as an issue
>> > in the python tests only, but during this work the Qt 6 based tests
>> > started failing and led to the actual underlying cause of the crash!)
>> > - Fixed an issue in the hub lines processing tool which caused failure
>> > to save features when running on newer GDAL versions (caused by newer
>> > GDAL rejecting geometries with nan z/m values)
>> > - Fix virtual layer provider failing to determine correct field types
>> > on some sqlite versions
>> > - Fix spatialite provider incorrectly retrieving features with null
>> > geometries when we explicitly ask for features within a given extent
>> > on newer spatialite versions
>> > - Fix 3d layout map exports are completely blank, and setting the 3d
>> > layout map to copy settings from a scene completely fails
>> > - Fix GDAL vrt items inside zip files don't show in browser
>> > - Fix default qml style for raster layers inside zip archives isn't
>> applied
>> > - Fix loading gdal rasters inside zip archives which also contain a
>> > .aux.xml file fails if only the zip archive is added as a layer
>> >
>> > I also took the opportunity to do a bunch of cleanups to tests, and
>> > specifically the way rendering tests were previously relying on the
>> > orfeo toolbox cdash server to allow retrieval and comparison of
>> > rendered vs expected images. Now it's done via a more modern approach,
>> > making the rendered image report directly available as an artifact on
>> > the pull request. (There's lots more we could do to make this further
>> > developer-friendly). This removes our reliance on the orfeo toolbox
>> > cdash server which has been broken for a number of months now.
>> >
>> > Thanks again for the opportunity to do this work!
>> >
>> > Nyall
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Qgis-psc mailing list
>> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list