[Qgis-psc] Finalizing the budget

[Alessandro Pasotti]

Hi Andreas,

I think my proposal probably came at the wrong time, there is no need to
rush  a decision.

We can discuss it thoroughly next year.

But, if we wanted to implement it for 2024, I think that we should allocate
a budget for at least 4 hours/week.

We could probably reduce (half?) the budget for QT6 migration because I
expect that most of the work will be completed with the 2023 budget.

I would really like to hear what other core devs think about this proposal
though, I only spoke with a few of them.

Kind regards


Il mar 12 dic 2023, 17:48 Andreas Neumann via QGIS-PSC <
qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> ha scritto:

> Dear PSC colleagues,
>
> I'd like to finalize the 2024 budget:
>
> The one major issue that needs discussion is the proposal from Ale to have
> fixed developers with fixed hours to do code and PR reviewing. What do
> the other PSC members think about this proposal?
>
> What is the required budget for this? Currently, we have 20k reserved for
> this. Is this enough? If not, how much would we need?
>
> If we would need more than 20k in the budget - what other budget items
> could we reduce to get a balanced out budget?
>
> See
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19JlXyiY8KH8gvrERVDGjcA_HWE49GwL42F__HdJnT7I/edit?usp=sharing
> for the current budget proposal.
>
> Thank you for your replies,
> Andreas
>
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20231213/e221ccf2/attachment.htm>