[Qgis-psc] Next 4.x LTR
David Signer
david at opengis.ch
Thu Aug 20 03:24:12 PDT 2026
Thanks, Denis, for raising this topic.
I understand the considerations publishing 4.2 as LTR. But I believe many
users would be disappointed by another rescheduling. They have been waiting
quite a while for a release with more than 4 months of support, especially
since we already rescheduled release 4.0. For most of them, an LTR is
nothing else than a release that gets longer support.
Of course, we would need to make it clear that e.g. HTML support is not
provided and that moving from 3 to 4 is a big step that carries some risks.
I just wanted to point this out. Anyway I'm open to being convinced that a
reschedule is really necessary. Thanks anyway and cheers
Dave
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 11:22 AM Denis Rouzaud via QGIS-PSC <
qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Dear PSC, dear Devs,
>
> On the release schedule, the next LTR still targets 4.2.4 in October.
>
> Two things to consider from
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/pull/377:
> - HTML print layout support is targeted for 4.4 (which is/seems to be a
> big blocker, requiring a backport)
> - The stability of 4.2 is questioned
>
> I also feel that we could wait for 4.4 to do a LTR but the timing is
> getting critical. "Enterprise" users are wondering what is the current
> status, and we don't have a clear answer.
>
> I believe it would be the right time to take a decision on this? So we
> can tell users a bit more in advance.
> Or is the decision already taken to stick to the plan?
>
> A related matter is the following question of keeping backports to 3.44.
>
> Cheers,
> Denis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20260820/240cb6f3/attachment.htm>
More information about the QGIS-PSC
mailing list