[Qgis-psc] Grant programme 2026 ready for voting

[Marco Bernasocchi]

Hi all, sorry for the late reply,
I'm also +1 on raising the budget and accept all technically sound projects.

Cheers

Marco Bernasocchi

QGIS.org Chair
OSGEO.org VP Europe
OPENGIS.ch CEO
http://berna.io

On Tue, 5 May 2026, 20:14 Anita Graser via QGIS-PSC, <
qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi Régis,
>
> > Or just the absence of a negative vote implicitly is enough ?
>
> That's correct. Like in previous years, the PSC retains the right to make
> executive decisions after the discussion period.
>
> Anita
>
> May 5, 2026 13:50:01 Régis Haubourg via QGIS-PSC <qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >:
>
> Hi,
>
> the list of QEP's seems good to me and if the finances allow, accepting
> them all would save us from a lot of work and frustration from rejected
> QEP's authors.
> However, I see some QEP's didn't have any vote during the discussion
> phase.
> Shouldn't we have a formal technical vote from core developpers before
> voting on fundings? Or just the absence of a negative vote implicitly is
> enough ?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Régis Haubourg
> Elected member at the Program Steering Comitee of QGIS.org.
> -
>
> On 05/05/2026 11:54, Andreas Neumann via QGIS-PSC wrote:
>
> Hi Harrissou,
>
> The plan is to first ask if we should accept all (56k) or stick to the
> budget (40k). If the latter, then we need to vote. If the former we can
> skip the voting.
>
> From the budget point of view we can afford to accept them all, because it
> is already clear that some budget items won't use all planned funds. It
> means we can afford to go the 16k over budget for the grants.
>
> Of course, only technically sound and useful project should be accepted.
>
> Personally I am +1 on accepting all proposals, if the core devs think the
> proposals are good enough and useful.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Tue, 5 May 2026 at 10:01, DelazJ via QGIS-PSC <qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anita, PSC
>> I probably have missed some information (and I would be happy to get
>> pointed to the decision) but grant proposals are no longer subject to QGIS
>> community (voting members) selection? Only code core commiters and PSC?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Harrissou
>>
>>
>> Le 5 mai 2026 09:06:30 GMT+02:00, Anita Graser via QGIS-PSC <
>> qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The discussion phase is over and we have compiled the summaries for a
>>> total of 9 proposals. Some QEPs are already accepted with two +1 votes,
>>> others are not yet officially accepted but none appear to raise any red
>>> flags:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/66
>>>
>>> The total budget requested is: € 56,850.
>>>
>>> This year's budget is € 40,000.
>>>
>>> @PSC members: Please cast your votes to:
>>>
>>> 1. Accept all proposals to the next stage.
>>>
>>> 2. Top up the budget so we can fund all proposals.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anita
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QGIS-PSC mailing list
>> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing listQGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20260509/6ac2c5ef/attachment.htm>