[Qgis-tr] Missing texts on transifex?

Alexandre Neto senhor.neto at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 07:30:00 PDT 2020


Hi Richard,

I agree with you. We should try to avoid restructuring LTR docs. Otherwise,
as it is hard for you to keep up with the developers, it's hard for
translator's to keep up with your work.

:-)

Alexandre Neto

A domingo, 26/07/2020, 11:45, Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmailings at duif.net>
escreveu:

> Transifex Webtranslation page for QGIS is on
> https://www.transifex.com/qgis/
>
> On 7/25/20 3:19 PM, Harrissou wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > There had been some restructuring of instructions in the first chapters
> of the training manual and I suspect there had not been an update of the
> po(?) files and push to Transifex since.
>
> Ok, I will push new files.
>
> But thinking about this, should we not more or less 'freeze' the 3.10
> docs? Although I am aware that there is still 3.10 work which should be
> backported. But reshuffling, is really breaking the translations. As every
> string is the 'message-key' for gettext/transifex. So changing a sentence
> (even adding a comma) makes the (potentially available) translation not to
> be used.
>
> So I would propose to only backport:
> - new sentences/paragraphs about 3.10 functionality
> - better build instructions or commands.
>
> What do you think?
>
> The alternative option is just to do the push more often (which is also
> not a real problem)...
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Duivenvoorde
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Translators mailing list
> Qgis-tr at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-tr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-tr/attachments/20200728/88325736/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-tr mailing list