[QGIS-trac] [Quantum GIS] #1865: ftools "Union" gives wrong results
with non overlapping polygons
Quantum GIS
qgis at qgis.org
Mon Aug 10 08:42:06 EDT 2009
#1865: ftools "Union" gives wrong results with non overlapping polygons
--------------------------------------------------------------+-------------
Reporter: lutra | Owner: cfarmer
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: critical: causes crash or data corruption | Milestone: Version 1.2.0
Component: Python plugins and bindings | Version: HEAD
Keywords: geoprocessing, overlay, union, non-overlapping | Platform_version:
Platform: All | Must_fix: No
Status_info: 0 |
--------------------------------------------------------------+-------------
I'm not sure to classify this as "critical" but as the resulting attribute
tables are wrong seems to me "data corruption". If I'm wrong please change
the priority of the ticket.
I noticed that applying the ftools "Union" tool to non overlapping
polygons (if the polygons do overlap then results are ok) returns *always*
a wrong attribute table.
The "old" geoprocessing tool plugin gives better results, as it does GRASS
v.overlay.or
I was playing around with different polygon layers with different table of
attributes (that for the "Union" operation does not make a lot of
difference), so I also noticed that in the same case (non overlapping
polygons) when the two attribute tables have different column names but
same types then both the "old" geoprocessing tool plugin and GRASS
v.overlay.or do an error.
I compared with the results given by the Union tool of Arcgis 9.x and
gvSIG and in this case the results are ok with both software, so if ftools
is going to be fixed then would be better to avoid the error made by the
other two qgis solutions.
See attached files.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1865>
Quantum GIS <http://qgis.org>
Quantum GIS is an Open Source GIS viewer/editor supporting OGR, PostGIS, and GRASS formats
More information about the QGIS-trac
mailing list