[QGIS-trac] Re: [Quantum GIS] #2444: Discrepancy between gdalinfo
and QGIS raster metadata
Quantum GIS
qgis at qgis.org
Wed Feb 17 06:29:57 EST 2010
#2444: Discrepancy between gdalinfo and QGIS raster metadata
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: alobo | Owner: nobody
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: major: does not work as expected | Milestone: Version 1.5.0
Component: Rasters | Version: HEAD
Resolution: | Keywords:
Platform_version: | Platform: Debian
Must_fix: No | Status_info: 1
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------
Comment (by rbivand):
Replying to [comment:7 mhugent]:
> With which tool has this tiff (test2.tif) been generated?
> It cannot be with the interpolation C++ plugin, because this only writes
ascii grid files as output (it is one of my intended mid-term improvements
to save it in any supported GDAL format, such as GeoTiff).
>
> Was it the GDAL Toos (python plugin)? Or the raster analysis (C++)
plugin?
This agrees with my analysis using 1.3.0 on F10. Agus said that the file
came from 1.4.0 on Windows. If the interpolator tool/plugin only produces
ARC ASCII files, then we do need to find out where the GTiff came from.
The interpolator is not the culprit here.
The interpolator-generated Arc ASCII raster that I made and read into R
using GDAL was imported correctly. I would, however, give a default square
cell resolution in the interpolator menu, which would mean that the GDAL-
specific DX/DY tags are not used (using a check box to revert to current
behaviour). Further, it would be great to be able to set the power for IDW
from the menu (maybe it is there, but I didn't see it).
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/2444#comment:8>
Quantum GIS <http://qgis.org>
Quantum GIS is an Open Source GIS viewer/editor supporting OGR, PostGIS, and GRASS formats
More information about the QGIS-trac
mailing list