[Qgis-user] Re: [Qgis-developer] bugs priority

[Paolo Cavallini]

Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> I suggest changing the priority:
> minor: annoyance or enhancement
> to
> minor: annoyance
> The current situation is ambiguous: a reporter is lead to think that an
> enhancement is to be classified always as minor, even when it's an
> important one.

Done - thanks Tim for allowing me to do so.
I would also like to change the component list: the current situation is
sometimes ambiguous. The ideal would be to have a classification system
both user friendly (easy to decide which category the bug belongs to)
and developer friendly (easy to check just the bugs in their respective
areas of interest).
A few possible changes:
- recombine "Plugins" and Python" into "C++ plugins" and "Python plugins"
- combine Translations and Internationalisation
- combine Graphics, Symbology and Marker Symbols
- drop SPIT
- include MapServer export into Python plugins

The current category list is:

 	Build/Install  	  	
	Data Provider 	 	
	Digitising 	 	
	Documentation and Help 	 	
	Graphics 	 	
	GRASS 	 	
	GUI 	 	
	Internationalisation 	
	MapCanvas 	
	Map Legend 	
	MapServer export 	
	Marker Symbols 	
	OGR Layer support 	
	Plugins 	
	Printing 	
	Projection Support 	
	Project Loading / Saving 	
	Python 	
	Rasters 	
	SPIT 	
	Symbology 	
	Translations 	
	Vectors 	
	WMS

Comments and other suggestions welcome. It would be great if some
developer would accept to become owner of one or more category.
Furthermore, I'm going to set some more default reports for specific
purposes (eg OSX bugs, etc. - again, suggestions welcome).
All the best.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc