[SPAM] RE: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...
Borys Jurgiel
borysiasty at aster.pl
Tue Jun 16 06:44:08 PDT 2009
Tuesday 16 of June 2009 15:03:11 Sampson, David napisaĆ(a):
>
> Just as I am going through a pseudo code exercise of release.py I see three
cases.
>
> 1. Current and previous stable versions VERSION
> 2. A Beta version is is being tested an on its way to stable. BETA
> 3. An unstable snapshot of the development trunk ALPHA
>
> If we assume that most new feature development is done in the branches and
merged to trunk, then trunk should not be all the harry and trashy. The branches
would be way to unstable.
>
> This way then regular users can try unstable and beta version of the plugins
wihtout needing to get into SVN carnage.
>
> For now I will call trunk snapshots BETA
>
> Just some thoughts.
So do we want to have three levels? The present "experimental" tagging style is
related to the fact that many authors just release either plugins considerable
as stable, or just some concepts. But if we are going to develop more
complicated plugins (and it seems we are), there is a reason to do more precise
tagging, of course
More information about the Qgis-user
mailing list