[Qgis-user] plugins organization/grouping proposal

[G. Allegri]

Ok :) thanks anyway for the mock

2009/11/4 Νίκος Αλεξανδρής <nikos.alexandris at felis.uni-freiburg.de>

> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:17 +0100, G. Allegri wrote:
> > Do you prefer at the bottom? Why? Usually their located in the
> > principal toolbar, as they're core functionalities for a gis, not
> > "service utilities"...
>
>
> Hmm... yes. I just wanted to show the group-box. I was to lazy to edit
> more and put it on top :-p
>
> But I wouldn't mind to be able to have them at the bottom line.
>
> Nikos
>
> >
> > 2009/11/4 Νίκος Αλεξανδρής <nikos.alexandris at felis.uni-freiburg.de>
> >
> >         On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 11:40 +0100, G. Allegri wrote:
> >         > > +1 for all of the above.
> >         > > I'd suggest to use just three categories for the plugins
> >         at this stage:
> >         > > Vector, Raster and General, where "General" would contain
> >         things like Grass,
> >         > > ManageR, GDALTools.
> >         >
> >         > I agree. The first step could be just one level with the
> >         proposed
> >         > categories. The nested model was just to design the system
> >         to be
> >         > easily extanded when the requirements will grow.
> >         > Vector, Raster, General resemble the GRASS namespaces: +1 :)
> >         >
> >         > giovanni
> >         >
> >         > PS: thanks Borys fro working on this. Good hackfest to
> >         everyone!
> >
> >
> >         a quick mockup:
> >         http://www.imagehack.gr/images/jsu0ipvsbt3giyihmloq.png :-)
> >
> >         Good hackfest @all, Nikos
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20091104/9c4b78ff/attachment.html>