[Qgis-user] feedback/bug report from a qgis course based on qgis-dev

[Andreas Neumann]

I see, we are in the same boat then ... with all advantages and risks 
resulting from the trunk.

I think that is fine as long as you clearly state to your course 
participants that the trunk is the development build and can sometimes 
result in unexpected surprises. I guess that after 1.4 stable that QGIS 
is mature enough for daily use without having to rely on trunk ..

Cheers,
Andreas

Giovanni Manghi wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> your are good points obviously. I know that is a little risky, but from
> my point of view it was almost a forced choice. First the trunk has too
> m.any new neat features that would be a shame not showing them, and
> second the 1.3 version has a few nasty bugs. In particular I remember
> one in vector symbology (qgis crashes). I can live with occasional
> crashes and problems in brand new features (and I guess/hope that our
> course attendees do understand it) but I cannot show a program that
> crashes while doing a simple symbology operation. Until now users are
> pretty impressed with the trunk version and common thing they say is
> that they didn't imagined that was possibile to do that much with Qgis.
>
> Cheers!
>
> -- Giovanni --
>
>
>
>
>