[Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

Bhaskaran bbkaran at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 13:37:06 PST 2012


My top three priorities are:

1) Documentation
2) Documentation
3) Documentation

I am sure there are other things to develop. However, at the moment the
knowledge of Sextante and QGIS is with a few users/developers. Majority of
the users struggle for a while and move on to use commercial apps. So let
us have a propoer documentation so that the exisiting featues can be fully
exploited.

bbkaran



On 3 December 2012 12:40, Pirmin Kalberer <pi_ml at sourcepole.com> wrote:

> Hi Victor
>
> Am Freitag, 30. November 2012, 23.52:20 schrieb Victor Olaya:
> [.....]
> >
> > Let's start with the second point.... How do you think we should spend
> > this money on SEXTANTE?
> >
>
> My personal priority list:
> 1. Reanimate Python code export
> 2. Support for database tables as input and output types
> This would be the starting point for implementing import and export
> workflows
> with SEXTANTE.
> 3. Support for spatialite as an intermediate format
> No more troubles with long layer names!
> 4. PostGIS algorithm collection
> 5. Merging history/log window with QGIS protocol windows
>
> Regards
> Pirmin
>
> --
> Pirmin Kalberer
> Sourcepole  -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> http://www.sourcepole.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20121204/a94dc24c/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-user mailing list