[Qgis-user] [Qgis-developer] Synergy of QGIS Enterprise and QGIS 2.0/Master branch

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

Pirmin what happens if / when QGIS project itself wants to release QGIS
Enterprise version - or another company? Maybe it would be better to call
it 'Sourcepole GIS' or something to make it clear that it is not an
official QGIS product but an official Sourcepole product? I think there is
going to be a lot of confusion otherwise with people thinking that it is
part of the QGIS project but they can't have it....

Also (out of curiosity) what is to stop one of your clients cloning the
private source tree that you provide and then making that publicly
available - or just pushing it back in to the mainstream QGIS tree? i.e. do
you realise any real long term benefit from keeping the tree private in the
first place?

Best regards

Tim


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Yves Jacolin (Free) <yjacolin at free.fr>wrote:
>
>> My understanding is that it is a commercial service, so you don't have any
>> licence.
>>
>
> No.  It's still GPL.
>
> Any support docs, or training sourcepole provide however are not. Only the
> QGIS software bit part
>
> - Nathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>


-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20130703/bfc7d879/attachment.html>