[Qgis-user] Local Government for QGIS

[Randal Hale]

I've contemplated the same thing. I've been working on an openforestry 
template (which I'm failing to update on github) for that very reason 
(well two - to see if I could do it and because I want to provide an 
alternative).

It's doable - it's just finding a coalition of the willing to start 
piecing it together. ESRI does have a lock with all those models: small 
government, utilities, forestry. Everyone gets roped in and then they 
get stuck. My current shaking my head moment is the ESRI Parcel Fabric 
model. You get so deep into that one on just the conversion work you'll 
never get out of it cleanly (I assume - I've never tried).

QGIS is the desktop component to make that happen with a database 
backend (right now for me it's postgresql/postgis). Support is the next 
biggie - people want someone to call and yell at when it doesn't work.

My .02 cents,
Randy

On 06/11/2015 04:28 PM, Steve G wrote:
> I am not sure this is the correct forum for a start to this discussion, but
> I've been pondering this for a while and interested what others think.  I
> work for local government in the U.S. and when people generally talk about
> GIS there is no doubt an automatic association with the ESRI ArcGIS
> platform.  And beyond GIS itself, the dominance that ESRI has is even more
> pronounced given the fact that many cities have implemented other related
> systems (permitting, computer aided dispatch, etc) that are identified
> business partners with ESRI.  Furthermore, the "GIS Local Government" track
> that ESRI developed has evolved to offer an "turnkey" approach for local
> government self-service to establish a robust geodatabase (Local Government
> Information Model), maps, apps, web services, etc.  This extends a COTS
> approach for local governments to establish, develop, and maintain a fairly
> complete GIS.  In my opinion, pure genius...because for a lot of small
> cities/governments with limited staff and budget, the turnkey approach is
> very appealing.  For city bureaucrats thinking about implementing/extending
> GIS, what they might think as little $$$ and you get all of this?
> Awesome...here's my money.
>
> HOWEVER, this approach has its drawbacks.  Long-term license/use costs,
> vendor lock-in, continuous waiting for someone at the company to fix
> something....well, the list goes on (just read any blog post supporting open
> source/FOSS).
>
> So, with the evolution of QGIS as a prevailing replacement/alternative for
> the other product, is anyone thinking about building more of a turnkey
> approach (database, maps, apps, web services, etc) geared to local
> governments?  I like the direction of the OpenGeo platform (and others)
> trying to provide the whole software stack, but still if a small local
> government wants to have a full fledged interactive GIS, it might seem like
> a lot of work to develop and maintain.
>
> I am interested in other thoughts...perhaps this belongs on a blog post
> somewhere more independent, but perhaps this can be a place to begin.
>
> Steve G.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Local-Government-for-QGIS-tp5210489.html
> Sent from the Quantum GIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

-- 
-----------------
Randal Hale
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjhale at northrivergeographic.com
twitter:rjhale     http://about.me/rjhale
http://www.northrivergeographic.com/introduction-to-quantum-gis
Southeast OSGEO: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Southeast_US