[Qgis-user] Who use reallythe Lwgeom-provider

Luigi Pirelli luipir at gmail.com
Sun Oct 18 08:16:23 PDT 2015


I suppose it's is a download counter, but better have confirmation by @elpaso

regards
Luigi Pirelli

**************************************************************************************************
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Elance: https://www.elance.com/s/edit/luigipirelli/
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* Mastering QGIS:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
**************************************************************************************************


On 16 October 2015 at 12:52, Andrea Peri <aperi2007 at gmail.com> wrote:
> THX.
> Do you know if the counter is for inique users or for simple download ?
>
> A.
>
> Il 16 ott 2015 12:38, "Sandro Santilli" <strk at keybit.net> ha scritto:
>>
>> I think we're talking about these:
>> http://plugins.qgis.org/search/?q=liblwgeom
>>
>> Specifically:
>> http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/processinglwgeomprovider/
>>
>> The website contains some stats, the first non-experimental
>> version (0.4.4) has had 2758 downloads since Sept 2014.
>>
>> --strk;
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:33:58AM +0200, Andrea Peri wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We are interested to know how many users are really using the
>> > lwgeom-provider and the MakeValid available in it.
>> >
>> > The need is to understand how it is really knowed and used from the qgis
>> > users.
>> >
>> > The question born yesterday when speaking with an our supplier it say
>> > us that don't know this availability of the makevalid in the
>> > liblwgeom-provider.
>> >
>> > So we try to show it the usage but see also that is was absolutely not
>> > easy to activate for a qgis user..
>> > Infact it require the availability of the lwgeom library that is not
>> > installed from the osgeo4w standard installation (only in the advanced
>> > and with a direct action by the user.
>> >
>> > This faxt let us to thinkthat perhaps the lwgeom-provider is a quite
>> > unusefl and substantially unknowed provider.
>> >
>> > So we like to understand better this.
>> > To decide if it is the right solution to plan to have the liblwgeom
>> > function directly in the qgis environment or otherwise is better to
>> > leave them only in the postgis or spatialite worlds and let the qgis
>> > user to use them only with the sql interface.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thx.
>> >
>> > --
>> > -----------------
>> > Andrea Peri
>> > . . . . . . . . .
>> > qwerty אטלעש
>> > -----------------
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Qgis-user mailing list
>> > Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



More information about the Qgis-user mailing list