[Qgis-user] Confusion with ellipsoidal method of $area
Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi
Thu Jan 7 01:33:22 PST 2021
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for the link to geographiclib calculator including the geometry. I used it in the feature request ticket that I created https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/40888.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Lähettäjä: Sebastian Gutwein <bas at rdgland.com>
Lähetetty: keskiviikko 6. tammikuuta 2021 18.11
Vastaanottaja: Nicolas Cadieux <njacadieux.gitlab at gmail.com>
Kopio: Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi>; qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
Aihe: Re: [Qgis-user] Confusion with ellipsoidal method of $area
Hello,
Sorry if this gets posted twice I previously attached a .gpkg and it bounced due to the 100kb limit.
I am enjoying this fascinating discussion. This is all fairly new to me so I looked some things up and want to make sure that I am getting things right,
1. In QGIS the $area function uses the sphere/ellipsoid settings of the project not of the CRS of the layer.
2. QGIS uses the PROJ library to calculate area
3. According to the PROJ documentation even.rouault.free.fr/proj_cpp_api/rst_generated/html/geodesic.html<http://even.rouault.free.fr/proj_cpp_api/rst_generated/html/geodesic.html> PROJ uses GeographicLib to calculate area.
If this is all true then if as Jukka Rahkonen describes the layer and the project were both EPSG:4326 and the ellipsoid in the Project-Settings was WGS 84 (EPSG:7030) then the QGIS measurements should be consistent (if they are correct is open to discussion).with this GeographicLib web calculator that says it uses the WGS84 ellipsoid geographiclib.sourceforge.io/cgi-bin/Planimeter?type=polygon&rhumb=geodesic&input=59.95688345+20.13293641%0D%0A60.47397663+26.94617837%0D%0A62.56499443+29.74782155%0D%0A68.70650340+27.45254202%0D%0A68.24937206+23.75771765%0D%0A65.27444593+25.42698984%0D%0A63.10353609+21.51545237%0D%0A61.12318104+21.40562760%0D%0A60.40477513+19.41123592%0D%0A59.95688345+20.13293641&option=Submit<http://geographiclib.sourceforge.io/cgi-bin/Planimeter?type=polygon&rhumb=geodesic&input=59.95688345+20.13293641%0D%0A60.47397663+26.94617837%0D%0A62.56499443+29.74782155%0D%0A68.70650340+27.45254202%0D%0A68.24937206+23.75771765%0D%0A65.27444593+25.42698984%0D%0A63.10353609+21.51545237%0D%0A61.12318104+21.40562760%0D%0A60.40477513+19.41123592%0D%0A59.95688345+20.13293641&option=Submit>
Using Jukka Rahkonen's points and processes I ended up with the same non consistent results as they reported. Attached is a geopackage with the polygon that I used,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:29 AM Sebastian Gutwein <bas at rdgland.com<mailto:bas at rdgland.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I am enjoying this fascinating discussion. This is all fairly new to me so I looked some things up and want to make sure that I am getting things right,
1. In QGIS the $area function uses the sphere/ellipsoid settings of the project not of the CRS of the layer.
2. QGIS uses the PROJ library to calculate area
3. According to the PROJ documentation even.rouault.free.fr/proj_cpp_api/rst_generated/html/geodesic.html<http://even.rouault.free.fr/proj_cpp_api/rst_generated/html/geodesic.html> PROJ uses GeographicLib to calculate area.
If this is all true then if as Jukka Rahkonen describes the layer and the project were both EPSG:4326 and the ellipsoid in the Project-Settings was WGS 84 (EPSG:7030) then the QGIS measurements should be consistent (if they are correct is open to discussion).with this GeographicLib web calculator that says it uses the WGS84 ellipsoid geographiclib.sourceforge.io/cgi-bin/Planimeter?type=polygon&rhumb=geodesic&input=59.95688345+20.13293641%0D%0A60.47397663+26.94617837%0D%0A62.56499443+29.74782155%0D%0A68.70650340+27.45254202%0D%0A68.24937206+23.75771765%0D%0A65.27444593+25.42698984%0D%0A63.10353609+21.51545237%0D%0A61.12318104+21.40562760%0D%0A60.40477513+19.41123592%0D%0A59.95688345+20.13293641&option=Submit<http://geographiclib.sourceforge.io/cgi-bin/Planimeter?type=polygon&rhumb=geodesic&input=59.95688345+20.13293641%0D%0A60.47397663+26.94617837%0D%0A62.56499443+29.74782155%0D%0A68.70650340+27.45254202%0D%0A68.24937206+23.75771765%0D%0A65.27444593+25.42698984%0D%0A63.10353609+21.51545237%0D%0A61.12318104+21.40562760%0D%0A60.40477513+19.41123592%0D%0A59.95688345+20.13293641&option=Submit>
Using Jukka Rahkonen's points and processes I ended up with the same non consistent results as they reported. Attached is a geopackage with the polygon that I used,
-Sebastian
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:52 PM Nicolas Cadieux <njacadieux.gitlab at gmail.com<mailto:njacadieux.gitlab at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
QGIS is currently built on Proj version 6.3.2-1. If the other libraries are using a spheroid by default, then they use a sphere for speed and not an ellipsoid for precision. You can probably force this measurement in QGIS by creating a custom CRS with a spheroid rather than an ellipsoid. The other option is to use the python in QGIS and to force a geoid.
Nicolas
On 2021-01-05 1:33 p.m., Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
Hi,
I suppose that PostGIS is using the WGS 84 ellipsoid but I am not sure where from the documentation I could find that information. The ST_Area document https://postgis.net/docs/ST_Area.html says only “For geography types by default area is determined on a spheroid with units in square meters”. Same thing with Spatialite, documentation suggests just that it is “the” spheroid http://www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/spatialite-sql-latest.html.
I did not notice this paragraph in the ST_Area document earlier “Enhanced: 2.2.0 - measurement on spheroid performed with GeographicLib for improved accuracy and robustness. Requires Proj >= 4.9.0 to take advantage of the new feature.” So no wonder that the web app and PostGIS give the same results because they both use GeographicLib. And SpatiaLite 5.0 is using RTTopo that is a library that is based on LWGeom so close connection in there too.
So perhaps the way to get identical areas from QGIS would be to make it to use GeographicLib as well. I have no idea if it is a realistic approach and worth making a feature request.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Lähettäjä: Nicolas Cadieux <njacadieux.gitlab at gmail.com><mailto:njacadieux.gitlab at gmail.com>
Lähetetty: tiistai 5. tammikuuta 2021 20.04
Vastaanottaja: Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi><mailto:jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi>; qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org>
Aihe: Re: [Qgis-user] Confusion with ellipsoidal method of $area
Hi,
Your method in QGIS is sound. Area is calculated using the wgs84 ellipsoid EPSG 7030. If you reproject to wgs84 zone 35N (I think this is close), area goes from 249566957499.7546m2 to 249566957499.721m2 or a difference of 0.0336 m2. I don't think densification would change things much.
My question is the following: You know that QGIS uses the WGS84 Ellipsoid. What Ellipsoid are using used in the other software??? If you don't know, I would proceed until you figure that out.
This is the currently used ellipsoid in the proj database in QGIS 3.16. You can get this by typing proj -le in the OSFeo4W Shell.
MERIT a=6378137.0 rf=298.257 MERIT 1983
SGS85 a=6378136.0 rf=298.257 Soviet Geodetic System 85
GRS80 a=6378137.0 rf=298.257222101 GRS 1980(IUGG, 1980)
IAU76 a=6378140.0 rf=298.257 IAU 1976
airy a=6377563.396 rf=299.3249646 Airy 1830
APL4.9 a=6378137.0 rf=298.25 Appl. Physics. 1965
NWL9D a=6378145.0 rf=298.25 Naval Weapons Lab., 1965
mod_airy a=6377340.189 b=6356034.446 Modified Airy
andrae a=6377104.43 rf=300.0 Andrae 1876 (Den., Iclnd.)
danish a=6377019.2563 rf=300.0 Andrae 1876 (Denmark, Iceland)
aust_SA a=6378160.0 rf=298.25 Australian Natl & S. Amer. 1969
GRS67 a=6378160.0 rf=298.2471674270 GRS 67(IUGG 1967)
GSK2011 a=6378136.5 rf=298.2564151 GSK-2011
bessel a=6377397.155 rf=299.1528128 Bessel 1841
bess_nam a=6377483.865 rf=299.1528128 Bessel 1841 (Namibia)
clrk66 a=6378206.4 b=6356583.8 Clarke 1866
clrk80 a=6378249.145 rf=293.4663 Clarke 1880 mod.
clrk80ign a=6378249.2 rf=293.4660212936269 Clarke 1880 (IGN).
CPM a=6375738.7 rf=334.29 Comm. des Poids et Mesures 1799
delmbr a=6376428. rf=311.5 Delambre 1810 (Belgium)
engelis a=6378136.05 rf=298.2566 Engelis 1985
evrst30 a=6377276.345 rf=300.8017 Everest 1830
evrst48 a=6377304.063 rf=300.8017 Everest 1948
evrst56 a=6377301.243 rf=300.8017 Everest 1956
evrst69 a=6377295.664 rf=300.8017 Everest 1969
evrstSS a=6377298.556 rf=300.8017 Everest (Sabah & Sarawak)
fschr60 a=6378166. rf=298.3 Fischer (Mercury Datum) 1960
fschr60m a=6378155. rf=298.3 Modified Fischer 1960
fschr68 a=6378150. rf=298.3 Fischer 1968
helmert a=6378200. rf=298.3 Helmert 1906
hough a=6378270.0 rf=297. Hough
intl a=6378388.0 rf=297. International 1909 (Hayford)
krass a=6378245.0 rf=298.3 Krassovsky, 1942
kaula a=6378163. rf=298.24 Kaula 1961
lerch a=6378139. rf=298.257 Lerch 1979
mprts a=6397300. rf=191. Maupertius 1738
new_intl a=6378157.5 b=6356772.2 New International 1967
plessis a=6376523. b=6355863. Plessis 1817 (France)
PZ90 a=6378136.0 rf=298.25784 PZ-90
SEasia a=6378155.0 b=6356773.3205 Southeast Asia
walbeck a=6376896.0 b=6355834.8467 Walbeck
WGS60 a=6378165.0 rf=298.3 WGS 60
WGS66 a=6378145.0 rf=298.25 WGS 66
WGS72 a=6378135.0 rf=298.26 WGS 72
WGS84 a=6378137.0 rf=298.257223563 WGS 84
sphere a=6370997.0 b=6370997.0 Normal Sphere (r=6370997)
Nicolas
On 2021-01-05 11:43 a.m., Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
Hi,
I wonder what method QGIS is using when it computes ellipsoidal area with $area function. I made a test with this EPSG:4326 polygon:
POLYGON (( 20.13293641 59.95688345, 26.94617837 60.47397663, 29.74782155 62.56499443, 27.45254202 68.7065034, 23.75771765 68.24937206, 25.42698984 65.27444593, 21.51545237 63.10353609, 21.4056276 61.12318104, 19.41123592 60.40477513, 20.13293641 59.95688345 ))
I checked that the CRS of the project and layer were both EPSG:4326. The ellipsoid in the Project-Settings was WGS 84 (EPSG:7030). The area that $area returns is
249566957499.7546
As a references I used PostGIS and web site https://geographiclib.sourceforge.io/scripts/geod-calc.html#area. With my test polygon they both give this result:
251199344354.4308
PostGIS returns bigger area. The difference is 0.654% so not huge but not negligible either.
A third test with SpatiaLite 5.0 gives a result that is very close to PostGIS (difference 0.001%).
251195856999.549927
As a conclusion I have decided to trust in PostGIS because it gives the same results than the web site https://geographiclib.sourceforge.io/scripts/geod-calc.html that feels scientifically sound. However, I wonder if I have used QGIS in a correct way or if there is anything I could do for getting areas to match better with PostGIS for example by densifying the long segments in my test polygon.
For getting testing easy I attach directly runnable SQL for PostGIS and Spatialite (version 5.0 with RTTopo is needed) as well as a coordinate list for the web app.
PostGIS
select st_area(st_geogfromtext('POLYGON ((
20.13293641 59.95688345,
26.94617837 60.47397663,
29.74782155 62.56499443,
27.45254202 68.70650340,
23.75771765 68.24937206,
25.42698984 65.27444593,
21.51545237 63.10353609,
21.40562760 61.12318104,
19.41123592 60.40477513,
20.13293641 59.95688345))') , true);
Spatialite
select st_area(st_geomfromtext('POLYGON ((
20.13293641 59.95688345,
26.94617837 60.47397663,
29.74782155 62.56499443,
27.45254202 68.70650340,
23.75771765 68.24937206,
25.42698984 65.27444593,
21.51545237 63.10353609,
21.40562760 61.12318104,
19.41123592 60.40477513,
20.13293641 59.95688345))') ,true);
Web site (notice lat-lon order)
59.95688345 20.13293641
60.47397663 26.94617837
62.56499443 29.74782155
68.70650340 27.45254202
68.24937206 23.75771765
65.27444593 25.42698984
63.10353609 21.51545237
61.12318104 21.40562760
60.40477513 19.41123592
59.95688345 20.13293641
-Jukka Rahkonen-
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org>
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
--
Nicolas Cadieux
https://gitlab.com/njacadieux
--
Nicolas Cadieux
https://gitlab.com/njacadieux
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org>
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20210107/5aae219a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Qgis-user
mailing list