<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Lester,<br><br>Are you using the Terrain analysis toolbox? Or using Sextante algorithms? <br><br>Regards,<br>Jose Santos<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:45:00 -0700<br>> From: tech_dev@wildintellect.com<br>> To: arctica1963@gmail.com<br>> CC: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Hillshade problem<br>> <br>> On 04/22/2013 11:05 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:<br>> > Hello,<br>> ><br>> > I have been trying to use the hillsahde option with some raster data, but I<br>> > have not managed to get a good result. The azimuth and angle can be changed<br>> > and that works fine, but the vertical exaggeration does not change - tried<br>> > values from 0.25 to 10, and all look identical ie grossly over-exaggerated.<br>> > Not sure what I am doing wrong?<br>> ><br>> > Any solutions would be appreciated. I am using v1.8.0 of QGIS.<br>> ><br>> > Lester<br>> ><br>> <br>> Are the pixel values different between those attempts? If so my guess is <br>> that you need to change your symbology to not stretch min/max as that <br>> might result in an identical looking image since the exaggeration is <br>> applied evenly to all pixels. ie. 1-10 will symbolize the same as 1-100 <br>> if the they are both 10 categories of colors and the exaggeration was x10.<br>> <br>> Enjoy,<br>> Alex<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Qgis-user mailing list<br>> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org<br>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user<br></div> </div></body>
</html>