<div dir="ltr">Hi Richard,<div><br></div><div>I didn't want to throw away all that was done, I'm sorry if it sounded like that. I reopened the ticket because a few people (including me) disagreed with the change, and did not take part in the initial discussion.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I understand too many options are not a good thing, on the other hand choice is good when it's not too confusing and easy to implement.</div><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>Etienne</div></div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rdmailings@duif.net" target="_blank">rdmailings@duif.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Etienne,<br>
<br>
I'm fine with the solution of Jef: make it an option (now that it is done).<br>
<br>
But in general: I do not like the fact that we had, I think, a<br>
discussion of about 2 weeks with several people, which is thrown out of<br>
the window because one reopens an issue and makes some noise. Apparently<br>
the time we/I put into this discussion was not worth my time.<br>
<br>
Besides this: I do not think having an option for everything is the best<br>
option ;-)<br>
<br>
Better to have a sensible default, have a discussion/voting and then<br>
deal with that. An extra setting I see as a bad compromise here. The<br>
Settings dialogs are getting more and more crowded with options I do<br>
really not know anymore for which minimal detail it is giving me options<br>
for.<br>
<br>
Please let us create some (ui/hud) vision and hold on to that, so we are<br>
not driving on user comments only.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Richard Duivenvoorde<br>
<div class=""><br>
<br>
On 25-02-14 18:24, Etienne Tourigny wrote:<br>
> I find it rather annoying also, and re-opened the bug.<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Moules<br>
> <<a href="mailto:jonathanmoules@warwickshire.gov.uk">jonathanmoules@warwickshire.gov.uk</a><br>
</div><div class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jonathanmoules@warwickshire.gov.uk">jonathanmoules@warwickshire.gov.uk</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Jürgen,<br>
> Thanks for the link.<br>
><br>
> From attempting to read that:<br>
><br>
> - There's no way to turn it off. :-(<br>
> - Shortcuts must be used instead. :-(<br>
> - Delete or Backspace should delete a layer without asking for<br>
> confirmation.<br>
><br>
> Is this correct?<br>
><br>
> Because if so, neither Delete nor Backspace works - they don't do<br>
> anything at all. Am I doing something wrong?<br>
><br>
> (Ctrl-D works - but that brings up the dialog... :-S )<br>
><br>
> Did I miss something or is this a bug?<br>
> Best,<br>
> Jonathan<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 25 February 2014 16:34, Jürgen E. <<a href="mailto:jef@norbit.de">jef@norbit.de</a><br>
</div><div><div class="h5">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jef@norbit.de">jef@norbit.de</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Jonathan,<br>
><br>
> On Tue, 25. Feb 2014 at 16:23:07 +0000, Jonathan Moules wrote:<br>
> > QGIS 2.2 has a confirmation dialog when I go to remove a<br>
> layer; Maybe<br>
> > it's me but I'm sure the previous versions didn't -<br>
> alternately I can't<br>
> > find a setting anywhere to turn this behaviour off (I'm<br>
> assuming I did in<br>
> > the past if it was there).<br>
> ><br>
> > Is this a new feature or have I just lost the setting?<br>
> Personally I find it<br>
> > quite annoying so would like to disable it.<br>
><br>
> See #9094[1]<br>
><br>
><br>
> Jürgen<br>
><br>
><br>
> [1] <a href="http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9094" target="_blank">http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9094</a><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel.<br>
> +49-4931-918175-31<br>
> Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax.<br>
> +49-4931-918175-50<br>
> Software Engineer D-26506 Norden<br>
> <a href="http://www.norbit.de" target="_blank">http://www.norbit.de</a><br>
> QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef<br>
> on FreeNode<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und<br>
> Informationssysteme mbH<br>
> Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden<br>
> GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Qgis-user mailing list<br>
</div></div>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
<div class="">> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and<br>
> may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to<br>
> RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the<br>
> named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you<br>
> may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have<br>
> received this transmission in error please notify the sender<br>
> immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, including without<br>
> limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording and/or<br>
> monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Qgis-user mailing list<br>
</div>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Qgis-user mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>