[QGIS-ZA-user] South African CRSs in QGIS

[Paul Young]

Hmmm. Interesting given it is being considered to drop Gauss and use UTM
going forward according to Rural Development

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:58 Frank Sokolic via qgis-za-user <
qgis-za-user at lists.osgeo.org wrote:

> Hi QGIS users,
>
> I noticed last week that these CRSs have appeared in QGIS under Project
> Coordinate Systems > Transverse Mercator:
>
> EPSG:102480 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo15
> EPSG:102481 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo17
> EPSG:102482 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo19
> EPSG:102483 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo21
> EPSG:102484 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo23
> EPSG:102485 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo25
> EPSG:102486 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo27
> EPSG:102487 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo29
> EPSG:102488 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo31
> EPSG:102489 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo33
> EPSG:102562 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo19_(E-N)
> EPSG:102563 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo21_(E-N)
> EPSG:102564 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo23_(E-N)
> EPSG:102565 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo25_(E-N)
> EPSG:102566 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo27_(E-N)
> EPSG:102567 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo29_(E-N)
> EPSG:102568 Hartebeesthoek94_Lo31_(E-N)
>
> Anyone know anything about them? Are these now the official South
> African CRSs in the EPSG database? If so, where are L015_(E-N),
> L017_(E-N) and L033_(E-N)?
>
> With these new additions, there are now a few versions of the South
> African CRSs in the QGIS CRS database (e.g. EPSG 2046 to EPSG 2055 as
> well as ZANGI:HBKNO15 to ZANGI:HBK033) so I guess things need to be
> cleaned up.
>
> Regards, Frank.
>
> _______________________________________________
> qgis-za-user mailing list
> qgis-za-user at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-za-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-za-user/attachments/20181113/7c6979ca/attachment.html>