[SAC] Subversion Wedgification

Mateusz Loskot mateusz at loskot.net
Tue Feb 6 03:49:03 EST 2007


Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> 
> I have confirmed that we seem to be using BDB instead of FSFS.  Does anyone
> see a reason we should use BDB instead of FSFS?

May be the reason is that FSFS is more killing for server than BDB,
it's code is also called as "less mature" whatever it means.

Here is detailed comparison:

http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/fsfs

> Is there someone available who is competent to transition
> from BSB to FSFS *cough* hobu *cough*?

I'm not competent, but I did such transition 2 times.
It is simple but time consuming because it's like a repository
migration, using dump/create new repo/load.
Here are details:

http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#bdb-fsfs-convert

-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net


More information about the Sac mailing list