[SAC] Subversion Wedgification

[Mateusz Loskot]

sbarnes at dmsolutions.ca wrote:
> The reason it's in BDB is because of it's maturity and
> it's far easier to recover if anything 'bad' happens. 

Shawn,

Hmm, isn't BDB more sensitive about 'bad' things than FSFS?

This seems to be the conclusion coming from the comparison in SVN book:

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.reposadmin.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backends

as well as from this FSFS notes [1] :

"Little or no need for recovery" - about FSFS

[1] http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/fsfs

Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net