[SAC] Server Planning
werner.macho at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 10:43:23 EST 2010
For qgis.org it's just been migrated to osgeo2 to take off some load of
And it's "only" a joomla instance and a mediawiki instance ..
Never thought of entering into some SAC WIKI, but I will if it's
I dont really think that we need our own VM for QGIS but I'm not a
member of the qgis-steering committee
- so let's wait for an answer of them ;)
hope that helps on the side of QGIS
Am 17.02.2010 16:38, schrieb Frank Warmerdam:
> Alex Mandel wrote:
>> Now that the servers are shipping, we can clearly focus on developing
>> our deployment plan.
>> To help here is a slew of answers from OSL to questions I had posted on
>> the wiki page:
> I have done some updates to this page, and I've sent out a query
> to the GRASS and QGIS projects to see if they have need of project
> VMs or not.
> On this page in the priority list you have "DNS". Why was that?
> Our DNS is all managed via pairnic, and I we don't run our own
> dns servers at all.
> I will note that snooping around on osgeo2 there seems to be lots
> of stuff that isn't documented in:
> Honestly, I'm a little peeved that people seem to set things up on
> this server, and then never keep track of them. Will they be surprised
> when they stop working? Looking around I see evidence of qgis.org,
> moodle, ocs, wiktionary, fossgis wiki, community.osgeo.org,
> planet.osgeo.org, but none of those were documented in the SAC list
> of services hosted on the system. Perhaps several of those aren't
> actually active, but it is hard for me to know, or find out who to
> contact about it.
> I certainly hope we can be more careful about keeping the
> SAC_Service_Status page (really a catalog of SAC managed systems
> and the services that are on them) up to date as we transition
>> * Is it easy to move VMs between the machines? Via web interface?
>> Yes with the cli, no web interface exists.
> There were quite a few questions about whether web interfaces exist
> to manage the VMs. Frankly, I'm at least as comfortable doing this
> sort of relatively rare thing by commandline mechanisms!
>> What kind of an ETA do you have for getting this deployed? I'm pretty
>> swamped for the next month or so but I should be able to get this setup.
>> I'm also waiting for the GA relase of Ganeti 2.1 which should be fairly
> Ouch - this sounds like hurry up and wait.
> Best regards,
More information about the Sac