[SAC] Server Planning

Alex Mandel tech_dev at wildintellect.com
Fri Feb 19 19:30:41 EST 2010

That seems reasonable enough. Of course in the back of your head
remember this is only for the physical machines, we'll also need an ID
system for all of the virtual machines.


Tyler Mitchell wrote:
> osgeo 3 and 4 .. carrying on our great tradition ? ;-)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Hamish <hamish_b at yahoo.com>
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010 3:49 pm
> Subject: Re: [SAC] Server Planning
> To: sac at lists.osgeo.org
>> Alex  wrote:
>>> if we could give the 2 machines more distinct names for them
>>> (If we don't care OSL is happy to name them for us using their
>>> local naming scheme).
>> I can't say it is any more distinct than "1" and "2", but in the
>> tradition of the US Naval Observatory's master atomic clocks
>> "tick" and "tock", how about "latitude" and "longitude".
>> 0.002c,
>> Hamish

More information about the Sac mailing list