[SAC] Trac and Postgres vs. SQLite DB
christopher.schmidt at nokia.com
christopher.schmidt at nokia.com
Wed Dec 21 16:49:15 EST 2011
I'm not aware of us having run into any problems now with our current setup.
Specifically, we have a lower set of apache children running, and they restart
every n requests, which resets the connection.
sqlite has given us enough problems that if I was going to do something, it
would probably be to look into whether trac can work in a prefix inside a single
db, and use that solution instead.
-- Chris
On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:30 PM, ext Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Howard / Chris,
>
> I'd like to create a Trac instance for GeoMoose. The standard procedure
> suggests creating a new Postgres db for each project. However, I have
> a recollection that each apache/trac instances is keeping a db connection
> open to each db and it seems to me that adding more databases to this
> cross product may be counter productive.
>
> Do you guys have any advice on whether to follow the standard procedure
> or if we might be better just using the default sqlite db for relatively low
> activity new projects?
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
More information about the Sac
mailing list