[SAC] Re: [support.osuosl.org #20349] Backup Implementation for OSGeo VMs

tech at wildintellect.com via RT support at osuosl.org
Thu Mar 1 19:43:42 EST 2012


Lance,

Attached is a current copy of our configuration. I'll post other answer
more publicly on another email.

Thanks,
Alex

On 03/01/2012 04:35 PM, Lance Albertson via RT wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Martin Spott via RT <support at osuosl.org>wrote:
> 
>> The combined net disk space on the OSGeo VM's is approx. 2 TByte and,
>> even though we currently don't use all of it, I think it's a good idea
>> being prepared to do so.
>>
> 
> That's going to take a nice chunk of space on our server but
> its manageable. Does your project have any funding to offset the costs of
> having us do the backups? I can give you an estimate for that if you'd like.
> 
> 
>> My favourite is to do one full backup per week, differentials every day
>> and to keep a full backup at least until the successor has finished, at
>> best until shortly before n+2 gets written to the media.
>> I was informed that we don't require retaining months of backup
>> history.  Thus the space requirements would account to approx.
>> 4.5 - 5 TByte (two full backups plus one busy week of differentials).
>>
> 
> We tend to retain more backups ourselves but we can have a specific
> schedule for your backups that meet your needs. We currently use SSL
> enabled connections so we'll have to give you some keys to get it to work
> with our setup. Do you have any special FileSet filters you use so you
> don't backup stuff like logs?
> 
> 
>> Currently we're backing up approx. 10 clients, I'd expect the number to
>> grow slightly.
>>
> 
> *nods* Currently restores have to be initiated by us but we are working
> towards creating access to work around that. Will this be a problem?
> 
> Thanks-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Martin Spott via RT <support at osuosl.org 
> <mailto:support at osuosl.org>> wrote:
> 
>     The combined net disk space on the OSGeo VM's is approx. 2 TByte and,
>     even though we currently don't use all of it, I think it's a good idea
>     being prepared to do so.
> 
> 
> That's going to take a nice chunk of space on our server but its


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bacula-dir.conf
Type: application/x-extension-conf
Size: 12042 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20120302/60ebb07f/bacula-dir.bin


More information about the Sac mailing list