[SAC] Mailman Postfix tuning - Urgent
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Fri Apr 18 19:02:18 PDT 2014
Thanks for your work on this Alex.
-Jeff
On Apr 18, 2014 10:03 PM, Alex Mandel <tech_dev at wildintellect.com> wrote:
>
> Disk rebuild on osgeo4 is taking longer than expected. Not sure why, but
> even with all the VMs off it was going at 2%/hour.
>
> After a couple of hours I turned on Mail so that we wouldn't impact the
> mailing lists for too long. The problem here is that Mail is the biggest
> i/o user on osgeo4.
>
> Poking around and reading up, I think there are some things that can be
> done to make Mail behave better but would really prefer someone who
> knows postfix step in and help out here.
>
> Ideas and observations:
> Ram-disk for the queues? (Yes we can allocate more ram to the instance)
>
> We seem to have a high deferred queue, do we need to clean out bad
> addresses? Perhaps increase the delay time, or spin off the deferred
> queue to another "graveyard" server?
>
> Is apache being hammered by bots scanning the archives?
>
> Are there bot like things trying to subscribe, I see some odd @wp.pl
> addresses in the apache logs, trying to hit many list in a few seconds
> and then rotating the username.
>
> Are we using a local DNS cache?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#queue_run_delay
>
> Who's up for the challenge?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> PS: I'll turn QGIS and Projects back on in a few hours. Hopefully this
> can be tuned before that. Adhoc will likely stay off for the weekend.
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
More information about the Sac
mailing list