[SAC] [Qgis-psc] Osgeo Code signing certificates

Angelos Tzotsos gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 04:00:00 PDT 2016


On 04/20/2016 01:54 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:39:03AM -0600, Larry Shaffer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If the OSGeo is considering taking the following stances...
> Larry, it looks like you misunderstood my stances completely.
>
>> * referring to the industry standard practice of code-signing, which
>> protects the user from anyone tampering with software they are installing
>> or have installed, as something that needs a workaround;
> I've nothing against code-signing, but I think the user needs to be
> able to decide who to trust.
>
>> * that the default security practices and implementations on major OSes is
>> somehow evil to their users, and that the users need protected from such
>> losses of freedom;
> It is evil if an OS enforces what's good or bad to a user.
> Not evil if the user decides who to trust.
>
>> * that the OSGeo needs to train users on how to circumvent these default
>> security protections;
> OSGeo needs to train users on how to tell their OS to trust OSGeo,
>
>> then an anti-reality warp is in effect, which will only hurt users who
>> actually just want to use the open-source software.
> Users that just want to use open-source software should be able to
> do so w/out their OS fighting against that. If any OS is fighting,
> OS advocates should fight back.
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
Hi,

I totally agree with Sandro on this issue.

Best,
Angelos


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos



More information about the Sac mailing list