[SAC] Experimental go git service open for tests on osgeo machine
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Tue Sep 6 06:32:17 PDT 2016
Hi Guido,
Actually we are already using this for FOSS4G (please login here and let
me know when you have, and let me know your user id, and then I can add
you to the 'foss4g' team). https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/foss4g/
Right now there are only 2 repositories ('foss4g.org' for that main
landing page of logos, and 'video.foss4g.org'), but I could create a
'2017.foss4g.org' repository for you. Let me know.
-jeff
On 2016-09-06 10:24 AM, Guido Stein wrote:
> When will ssh be added to this service? When will this service be an
> official non test?
>
> Just trying it out and had some questions.
>
> Thanks for all your efforts.
>
> -Guido
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:37 AM Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net
> <mailto:strk at keybit.net>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 07:56:02PM -0400, Tom Kralidis wrote:
> >
> > Anyone have any idea/feedback on the scope/scale? Are we
> > looking for a full fledged web/SCM env, or something as an
> > alternative to keep lighter weight repositories, etc.?
>
> I think for a start it would be useful to have something that
> allows us to keep system configurations in private repositories,
> like this: https://git.osgeo.org/_gogs_/sac/gogs-config
>
> I did start keeping more configs under local gits on the trac/svn
> machine but didn't push it yet to the SCM.
>
> We could also use Gogs to more easily manage operational tickets,
> creating issue-only repositories for operational purposes, like:
> https://git.osgeo.org/_gogs_/sac/gogs-service
>
> That said, Gogs is in alpha stage and its development is very
> active. I still don't have a sense of how many features are
> missing that are really important for OSGeo projects and would
> like to know. The https://git.osgeo.org/_gogs_/sac/gogs-service
> repo might serve that purpose (see Issues).
>
> --strk;
More information about the Sac
mailing list