[SAC] Nominate Harrison to Join SAC

[Jody Garnett]

The ritual is worse, now Alex gets to update the website.

--
Jody Garnett

On 13 March 2017 at 17:40, Alex Mandel <tech_dev at wildintellect.com> wrote:

> Apologies, been really bad about keeping track of emails, filtering
> system broke down for a week.
>
> Yes based on all positive feedback from multiple members, Harrison is
> now part of SAC.
>
> Hopefully he has a report on the marketing proposal's technology
> component for the website rebrand.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On 03/13/2017 07:02 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:38:18AM -0600, Harrison Grundy wrote:
> >> I assume the next steps involve a ritual with robes in a cave where we
> sacrifice livestock. At least, that's how every *other* sysadmin thing I've
> worked on went.
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > I expected a mail from Alex to draw conclusions of the vote, so
> > it can serve as a reference. Then I guess you'll want to add
> > your name and "focus" on the wiki page about SAC, and maybe
> > join #osgeo-sac and things like that (we need a formal welcome
> > pack here :)
> >
> > --strk
> >
> >> Harrison
> >>
> >>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:34 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Alex, what happened with this nomination ?
> >>> Did it pass ? If so, what are the next steps ?
> >>>
> >>> I'm touching the ground as I'd like to see more sysadmin
> >>> work being conducted (mostly Wiki/LDAP integration) and
> >>> wondering if Harrison could also help with that :)
> >>>
> >>> --strk;
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 05:19:36PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:
> >>>> All, I'd like to nominate Harrison Grundy (aka astrodog) to join SAC.
> >>>> He'll be joining initially as our liaison to marketing for the new
> website
> >>>> branding overhaul, and has a track record helping out in the past on
> various
> >>>> SAC issues, as well as professional sys admin experience.
> >>>>
> >>>> We should probably formalize this, but I suggest for new members we
> simply
> >>>> nominate by existing member, and then give a period of time for
> anyone to
> >>>> voice an objection, 48 hours perhaps? Maybe I should make a motion
> about
> >>>> adopting this practice? Since we don't have it in place, then members
> should
> >>>> vote per normal motions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20170322/9795c2f8/attachment.html>