[SAC] Fwd: component 2 review

[Regina Obe]

I would say 3.3.2.19, 3.3.2.21 are things that should fall under SAC's jurisdiction.  Especially the LDAP one since it would be just as much effort for us to have GetInteractive do it and we assure we can maintain it as it is for us to just do the whole thing.  As noted in ticket -  

 

 

https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2038

 

The plugins AFAICS we can use are listed here:

 

https://wordpress.org/plugins/search/openldap/

 

So only question I would have for GetInteractive is if they have any experience with the above and think one is better over any other.

 

 

I'm willing to take ownership of this one.

 

The other items I'm not entirely clear about so we can discuss tomorrow.

 

Thanks,

Regina

 

 

From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:26 AM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [SAC] Fwd: component 2 review

 

Those are the items in the contract, I have never really paid attention to them ... still let me have a go.

 

3.3.2.19 Integration existing LDAP registry, installation and configuration

 

(workaround) This was expected to be done during beta, due to communication this item was not done. The content sprint at foss4gna was accomlished by opening up security whilelist restrictions and creating individual accounts.

 

This is integration SAC is performing currently correct?

 

 

3.3.2.21 Installation and technical support after launching website

 

Not sure, can seek clarification in tomorrows meeting.

 

3.3.2.22 Monitoring and reporting after launching website

 

Not sure, can seek clarification in tomorrows meeting.

--

Jody Garnett

 

On 22 November 2017 at 18:22, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us <mailto:lr at pcorp.us> > wrote:

Jody,

 

I have added to the agenda for this week, though I suspect many folks will not be able to attend this week given the Thanksgiving holidays in US so we may need to rediscuss in the following SAC meeting in early December.

 

I'm not clear what needs to be done with the below items, as I thought those were responsibilities SAC was going to take on and not required of Get Interactive.

 

Thanks,

Regina

 

From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> ] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:51 AM
To: System Administration Committee <sac at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:sac at lists.osgeo.org> >
Subject: [SAC] Fwd: component 2 review

 

Passing on a review email from marketing committee, there are a number of contract line items to do with website transfer for sac to sign off on when ready. 

*        3.3.2.19 Integration existing LDAP registry, installation and configuration

*        3.3.2.21 Installation and technical support after launching website

*        3.3.2.22 Monitoring and reporting after launching website

Could this be added to the next SAC meeting, or handled on email as appropriate

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------

 

Okay, got some internet connectivity, and am reviewing the component 2 delivery items:

​

 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RItHzHM4Ltl5UiWSH_LQRPetQdMD4sQa9LX_tYG5IpQ/edit?usp=drive_web>  OSGeo - Project Delivery Sign-off

​

I have raised a few issues as I go, and hope to make a motion for acceptance once this review is complete:

*        Local Chapter Page Event listing and event calendar integration <https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/168> 

*        Initiative Page showing resources and news <https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/169>  

*        Downloads <https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/170> 

*        Event list with calendar view <https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/171> 

*        Partner detail page with relevant initiatives, projects and resources <https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/172> 

In a few cases the functional may be (or may not) be present, but we lack an example showing it working. The general weakness is integration between pages that are expected to automatically cross link between events, resources and news. This is an important integration point because we are trying to post content once and have it cross-linked for discoverability (rather than rely on manually editing pages - such as done currently for initiatives).

 

Recommendation: We accept component 2 with the above known issues

 

I could not verify the following:

 

3.3.2.18 Newsletter

- Subscribe / unsubscribe newsletter form;

- Design newsletter template;

- Template configuration in MailChimp.

 

If someone who attended the mail chimp training could sign off on these rows it would be appreciated.

 

--

Jody Garnett

-- 

--

Jody Garnett


_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Sac at lists.osgeo.org> 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20171122/9c0e8cbf/attachment-0001.html>