[SAC] [OSGeo] #2750: mail aliases fail anti-spoof measures
    Javier Jimenez Shaw 
    j1 at jimenezshaw.com
       
    Mon May  2 02:52:20 PDT 2022
    
    
  
Hi Sandro
I am not an expert in email services configuration. Recently I am having
problems with SPF and GMail (they become more restrictive the last times).
But I have a different behaviour with "sac" mailing list than with
"gdal-dev".
Is it possible that "sac" is using DKIM authentication and "gdal-dev" or
"proj" don't?
This is what I sent before:
I was getting also strange emails from gdal-dev and proj mailing lists...
and now I do not get them any more.
My personal email (from may domain) is redirecting the emails to my gmail
account.
The emails sent by lists.osgeo.org have a big yellow banner that says
"Gmail could not verify that it actually came from lists.osgeo.org. Avoid
clicking links, downloading attachments or replying with personal
information."
In the headers I can see
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=fail (google.com: domain of
gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org does not designate 134.....204 as
permitted sender)
This is happening since March 24th
The thing is that it is only happening with those lists (gdal-dev and
proj).
With sac mailing list it has no problem (apparently). The header is a bit
different
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@osgeo.org header.s=mail
header.b=c0FiFf0V;
       dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@osgeo.org
header.s=mail header.b=AfjBJ1Hn;
       spf=fail (google.com: domain of sac-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
does not designate 134......204 as permitted sender)
Thanks
.___ ._ ..._ .. . ._.  .___ .. __ . _. . __..  ... .... ._ .__
Entre dos pensamientos racionales
hay infinitos pensamientos irracionales.
On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 23:57, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:28:56PM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> > I believe the SAC mailing list settings were not yet updated to "Munge
> From"
> > as was requested for all lists (see the long discussion at
> > https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2475 ). I have now also updated the
> SAC
> > mailing list settings to follow that as well.
>
> The reporter mentioned that SAC list was NOT having the problem,
> does it mean "Munge From" will introduce  the problem here too ?
>
> --strk;
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20220502/d0a60d3b/attachment.htm>
    
    
More information about the Sac
mailing list