From strk at kbt.io Wed Oct 1 23:49:30 2025 From: strk at kbt.io ('Sandro Santilli') Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:49:30 +0200 Subject: osgeo4 deployment mismatch with Ansible In-Reply-To: <000501dc2f09$38212660$a8637320$@pcorp.us> References: <000501dc2f09$38212660$a8637320$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > > x. An "ansible-control" container would be created > > > > On the host we have both "ansible-dev" and "ansible-dev-old" > > containers, and BOTH are in RUNNING state, shall I drop them > > both and let the ansible playbook do its thing ? > > I've dropped ansible-dev-old. Leave ansible-dev alone as I'm using that one and wasn't built from Ansible. How's ansible-dev supposed to be different from ansible-control ? Could we just rename it to be in agreement with Ansible ? --strk; -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 659 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lr at pcorp.us Thu Oct 2 01:43:31 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 04:43:31 -0400 Subject: osgeo4 deployment mismatch with Ansible In-Reply-To: References: <000501dc2f09$38212660$a8637320$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <000901dc3378$a2696320$e73c2960$@pcorp.us> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > > > x. An "ansible-control" container would be created > > > > > > On the host we have both "ansible-dev" and "ansible-dev-old" > > > containers, and BOTH are in RUNNING state, shall I drop them > > > both and let the ansible playbook do its thing ? > > > > I've dropped ansible-dev-old. Leave ansible-dev alone as I'm using that one > and wasn't built from Ansible. > > How's ansible-dev supposed to be different from ansible-control ? > Could we just rename it to be in agreement with Ansible ? > > --strk; I don't know what ansible-control is. Is that something you created? I setup ansible-dev to work on ansible and it has my home account and password key on it and configured just the way I want it. Too difficult to do ansible work on my desktop. From strk at kbt.io Fri Oct 3 09:57:50 2025 From: strk at kbt.io ('Sandro Santilli') Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 18:57:50 +0200 Subject: osgeo4 deployment mismatch with Ansible In-Reply-To: <000901dc3378$a2696320$e73c2960$@pcorp.us> References: <000501dc2f09$38212660$a8637320$@pcorp.us> <000901dc3378$a2696320$e73c2960$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 04:43:31AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > > > > How's ansible-dev supposed to be different from ansible-control ? > > Could we just rename it to be in agreement with Ansible ? > > I don't know what ansible-control is. Is that something you created? It came into ansible-deployment 2 years ago: https://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/e62d15fd3cd982c17550024fd6746cf2c1b10153 and was tweaked again first to allow for nesting: https://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/6c5a85abc9fc996787133237f439e484568face7 and than to be for debian-12: https://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/35df8371eb0955af84060fed77708f5511f02d2f > I setup ansible-dev to work on ansible and it has my home account and > password key on it and configured just the way I want it. Check out deployment/roles/osgeo4/tasks/main.yml - how about we rename your ansible-dev to ansible-control and check that deploying tag container_ansible of osgeo4 role doesn't introduce any change ? > Too difficult to do ansible work on my desktop. Yes I remember this, it's probably the main reason why ansible-control was planned --strk; -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 659 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trac_osgeo at osgeo.org Sun Oct 5 00:45:33 2025 From: trac_osgeo at osgeo.org (OSGeo) Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 07:45:33 -0000 Subject: [OSGeo] #2980: Change default committer name and email on weblate In-Reply-To: <034.d9ca329d77828bd757f62aa1d064cdea@osgeo.org> References: <034.d9ca329d77828bd757f62aa1d064cdea@osgeo.org> Message-ID: <049.0348b22dd8c9da933fa5491e92e4b3f4@osgeo.org> #2980: Change default committer name and email on weblate ------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@? Type: task | Status: reopened Priority: normal | Milestone: Unplanned Component: SysAdmin/Weblate | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------+------------------------ Changes (by strk): * component: SysAdmin => SysAdmin/Weblate -- Ticket URL: OSGeo OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker. From strk at kbt.io Fri Oct 10 21:40:44 2025 From: strk at kbt.io (Sandro Santilli) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 06:40:44 +0200 Subject: This is a test In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7514B8A5-E283-456C-ACDE-2D073BFB66FE@kbt.io> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-encrypted Size: 10 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: encrypted.asc Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2259 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lr at pcorp.us Sat Oct 18 18:44:35 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 21:44:35 -0400 Subject: Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 Message-ID: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> I'm shutting down osgeo5 (aka backup.osgeo.osuosol.org) and osgeo6 physical servers to confirm we have nothing left in our infra that relies on these. Cc'ing support just in case they have monitoring that will go off as a result of this. Thanks, Regina From support at osuosl.org Sat Oct 18 18:44:50 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (lr@pcorp.us via RT) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 18:44:50 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: A new ticket has been created and assigned an ID of [support.osuosl.org/34471]. --- From: I'm shutting down osgeo5 (aka backup.osgeo.osuosol.org) and osgeo6 physical servers to confirm we have nothing left in our infra that relies on these. Cc'ing support just in case they have monitoring that will go off as a result of this. Thanks, Regina From lr at pcorp.us Sat Oct 18 18:59:11 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 21:59:11 -0400 Subject: Testing after shutdown Message-ID: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> Testing mail after osgeo6 physical server shutdown. From maplabs at light42.com Sat Oct 18 19:37:16 2025 From: maplabs at light42.com (Brian M Hamlin) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 19:37:16 -0700 Subject: Testing after shutdown In-Reply-To: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> References: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <8b076a92-13ec-6246-969c-1d39b88f9ad1@light42.com> ack-list On 10/18/25 18:59, Regina Obe wrote: > Testing mail after osgeo6 physical server shutdown. > From lnicola at dend.ro Sun Oct 19 11:22:45 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 21:22:45 +0300 Subject: Testing after shutdown In-Reply-To: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> References: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <951470db-c5bf-44a2-8126-969418055942@app.fastmail.com> sup? On Sun, Oct 19, 2025, at 04:59, Regina Obe wrote: > Testing mail after osgeo6 physical server shutdown. From lr at pcorp.us Sun Oct 19 11:31:31 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:31:31 -0400 Subject: Testing again Message-ID: <000601dc4126$98030650$c80912f0$@pcorp.us> This is another test to see if mail makes it to sac mailing list. Thanks, Regina From lr at pcorp.us Sun Oct 19 11:58:05 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:58:05 -0400 Subject: Testing after shutdown In-Reply-To: <951470db-c5bf-44a2-8126-969418055942@app.fastmail.com> References: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> <951470db-c5bf-44a2-8126-969418055942@app.fastmail.com> Message-ID: <001e01dc412a$4dc37800$e94a6800$@pcorp.us> > From: Lauren?iu Nicola via Sac > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2025 2:23 PM > To: sac at lists.osgeo.org > Subject: Re: Testing after shutdown > > sup? > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2025, at 04:59, Regina Obe wrote: > > Testing mail after osgeo6 physical server shutdown. Not seeing the mails show here https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2025-October/date.html Though clearly people are receiving them. I'm going to try another mailing list. Thanks, Regina From lnicola at dend.ro Sun Oct 19 11:59:12 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 21:59:12 +0300 Subject: Testing after shutdown In-Reply-To: <001e01dc412a$4dc37800$e94a6800$@pcorp.us> References: <000301dc409b$f7261950$e5724bf0$@pcorp.us> <951470db-c5bf-44a2-8126-969418055942@app.fastmail.com> <001e01dc412a$4dc37800$e94a6800$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: Wdym, I see them: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2025-October/016875.html On Sun, Oct 19, 2025, at 21:58, Regina Obe wrote: >> From: Lauren?iu Nicola via Sac >> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2025 2:23 PM >> To: sac at lists.osgeo.org >> Subject: Re: Testing after shutdown >> >> sup? >> >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2025, at 04:59, Regina Obe wrote: >> > Testing mail after osgeo6 physical server shutdown. > > > Not seeing the mails show here > > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2025-October/date.html > > Though clearly people are receiving them. > > I'm going to try another mailing list. > > Thanks, > Regina From maplabs at light42.com Sun Oct 19 19:04:53 2025 From: maplabs at light42.com (Brian M Hamlin) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 19:04:53 -0700 Subject: Testing again In-Reply-To: <000601dc4126$98030650$c80912f0$@pcorp.us> References: <000601dc4126$98030650$c80912f0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <8880b3fc-05db-05d8-7f37-f60d57269a85@light42.com> the list reply button in desktop thunderbird makes an email list this On 10/19/25 11:31, Regina Obe wrote: > This is another test to see if mail makes it to sac mailing list. > > Thanks, > Regina > From support at osuosl.org Mon Oct 20 07:33:49 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (Lance Albertson via RT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 07:33:49 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: On Sat Oct 18 18:44:50 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > I'm shutting down osgeo5 (aka backup.osgeo.osuosol.org) and osgeo6 physical > servers to confirm we have nothing left in our infra that relies on these. > > Cc'ing support just in case they have monitoring that will go off as a result > of this. Thanks for the heads up. What are your plans for these machines moving forward? -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab From lr at pcorp.us Mon Oct 20 07:43:02 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 10:43:02 -0400 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <002201dc41cf$d70818a0$851849e0$@pcorp.us> > On Sat Oct 18 18:44:50 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > I'm shutting down osgeo5 (aka backup.osgeo.osuosol.org) and osgeo6 > > physical servers to confirm we have nothing left in our infra that relies on > these. > > > > Cc'ing support just in case they have monitoring that will go off as a > > result of this. > > Thanks for the heads up. What are your plans for these machines moving > forward? > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab Osgeo6 we are still reviewing disk replacement options and pricing. Osgeo5 we plan to throw away. Have you started moving to the new datacenter? We weren't sure if it's easier for you to do the replacement once you move over osgeo6 or after. We don't plan to put anything on osgeo6 until it's been moved to its new home. From support at osuosl.org Mon Oct 20 07:43:16 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (lr@pcorp.us via RT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 07:43:16 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: <002201dc41cf$d70818a0$851849e0$@pcorp.us> References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> <002201dc41cf$d70818a0$851849e0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: > On Sat Oct 18 18:44:50 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > I'm shutting down osgeo5 (aka backup.osgeo.osuosol.org) and osgeo6 > > physical servers to confirm we have nothing left in our infra that relies on > these. > > > > Cc'ing support just in case they have monitoring that will go off as a > > result of this. > > Thanks for the heads up. What are your plans for these machines moving > forward? > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab Osgeo6 we are still reviewing disk replacement options and pricing. Osgeo5 we plan to throw away. Have you started moving to the new datacenter? We weren't sure if it's easier for you to do the replacement once you move over osgeo6 or after. We don't plan to put anything on osgeo6 until it's been moved to its new home. From support at osuosl.org Mon Oct 20 07:51:20 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (Lance Albertson via RT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 07:51:20 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> <002201dc41cf$d70818a0$851849e0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: On Mon Oct 20 07:43:16 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up. What are your plans for these machines moving > > forward? > > Osgeo6 we are still reviewing disk replacement options and pricing. > Osgeo5 we plan to throw away. > > Have you started moving to the new datacenter? We weren't sure if it's easier > for you to do the replacement once you move over osgeo6 or after. > > We don't plan to put anything on osgeo6 until it's been moved to its new home. We haven't started moving but I'm hoping that will happen within the next month. We're working out some final admin details with the new location. It's really up to you with how the move might impact the service eventually being hosted on the new system. I don't think it will be a problem if we go ahead and get it setup sooner than later since I don't think we'll be ready to move in for at least another month. Let me know when you're completely done with osgeo5 so we can wipe the disks and see if there's any more use we can get out of it. Otherwise, we'll send it to surplus if that's okay with you. Thanks- -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab From strk at kbt.io Thu Oct 23 11:47:50 2025 From: strk at kbt.io (Sandro Santilli) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 20:47:50 +0200 Subject: Testing again In-Reply-To: <8880b3fc-05db-05d8-7f37-f60d57269a85@light42.com> References: <000601dc4126$98030650$c80912f0$@pcorp.us> <8880b3fc-05db-05d8-7f37-f60d57269a85@light42.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 07:04:53PM -0700, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > the list reply button in desktop thunderbird makes an email list this Brian your Thunderbird configuration seems to still think "list reply" means sending the mail to the _wrong_ address sac at mail.osgeo.org, apparently It only happens to you so I would tend to believe it's something about your own mail setup. --strk; From lnicola at dend.ro Thu Oct 23 11:50:18 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 21:50:18 +0300 Subject: Testing again In-Reply-To: References: <000601dc4126$98030650$c80912f0$@pcorp.us> <8880b3fc-05db-05d8-7f37-f60d57269a85@light42.com> Message-ID: <77ef1190-df94-464f-8b83-67793ec35e9f@betaapp.fastmail.com> It's not Thunderbird, it's his email server doing CNAME resolution: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3444#comment:7 On Thu, Oct 23, 2025, at 21:47, Sandro Santilli via Sac wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 07:04:53PM -0700, Brian M Hamlin wrote: >> the list reply button in desktop thunderbird makes an email list this > > Brian your Thunderbird configuration seems to still think "list reply" > means sending the mail to the _wrong_ address sac at mail.osgeo.org, apparently > > It only happens to you so I would tend to believe it's something about > your own mail setup. > > --strk; From maplabs at light42.com Thu Oct 23 11:52:08 2025 From: maplabs at light42.com (Brian M Hamlin) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:52:08 -0700 Subject: Testing again In-Reply-To: <77ef1190-df94-464f-8b83-67793ec35e9f@betaapp.fastmail.com> References: <000601dc4126$98030650$c80912f0$@pcorp.us> <8880b3fc-05db-05d8-7f37-f60d57269a85@light42.com> <77ef1190-df94-464f-8b83-67793ec35e9f@betaapp.fastmail.com> Message-ID: reply-all does this from desktop Thunderbird with ordinary settings On 10/23/25 11:50, Lauren?iu Nicola wrote: > It's not Thunderbird, it's his email server doing CNAME resolution: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3444#comment:7 > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025, at 21:47, Sandro Santilli via Sac wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 07:04:53PM -0700, Brian M Hamlin wrote: >>> the list reply button in desktop thunderbird makes an email list this >> Brian your Thunderbird configuration seems to still think "list reply" >> means sending the mail to the _wrong_ address sac at mail.osgeo.org, apparently >> >> It only happens to you so I would tend to believe it's something about >> your own mail setup. >> >> --strk; From vicky at erosion.dev Thu Oct 23 13:07:31 2025 From: vicky at erosion.dev (Vicky Vergara) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:07:31 -0600 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34306] Disks specification for osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <000d01dc29b2$799afc30$6cd0f490$@pcorp.us> <002601dc2bce$a19ed2b0$e4dc7810$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: Hi all This the option Regina found: https://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-Inch-Internal-MZ-77E1T0B-AM/dp/B08QB93S6R/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2GY3TIQOCCXY4&th=1 We would use size 2TB disks: $186 * 6 = $1116 Will give us 12TB space which I think will be at least 6TB of usable space (RAID would take the other 6TB) Keep in mind we are throwing out osgeo3 and osgeo4 (which has all the backups, staging) So we do need the space Please let me know your comments Regards Vicky On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 9:02?AM Lance Albertson via RT wrote: > On Mon Sep 22 07:39:10 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > We want the whole server reformatted so what is currently there is > irrelevant. > > No need to try to salvage any data. > > > > We switched over mail and lists on that server already to osgeo9 over the > > weekend. We plan to keep osgeo6 live for perhaps another week or so and > then > > have you shut it off. > > > > We have a backup of all the pieces we cared to keep already. > > > > Right now we are just trying to figure out how much we want to spend for > disks > > on this server Vs. how much space we'll be able to expand. > > Well that makes it easy :) > > The only requirements you need is that the disks need to be SATA and 2.5" > form > factor. Other than that, anything should work. > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From support at osuosl.org Thu Oct 23 13:07:57 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (vicky@erosion.dev via RT) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:07:57 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34306] Disks specification for osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <002601dc2bce$a19ed2b0$e4dc7810$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: Hi all This the option Regina found: https://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-Inch-Internal-MZ-77E1T0B-AM/dp/B08QB93S6R/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2GY3TIQOCCXY4&th=1 We would use size 2TB disks: $186 * 6 = $1116 Will give us 12TB space which I think will be at least 6TB of usable space (RAID would take the other 6TB) Keep in mind we are throwing out osgeo3 and osgeo4 (which has all the backups, staging) So we do need the space Please let me know your comments Regards Vicky On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 9:02?AM Lance Albertson via RT wrote: > On Mon Sep 22 07:39:10 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > We want the whole server reformatted so what is currently there is > irrelevant. > > No need to try to salvage any data. > > > > We switched over mail and lists on that server already to osgeo9 over the > > weekend. We plan to keep osgeo6 live for perhaps another week or so and > then > > have you shut it off. > > > > We have a backup of all the pieces we cared to keep already. > > > > Right now we are just trying to figure out how much we want to spend for > disks > > on this server Vs. how much space we'll be able to expand. > > Well that makes it easy :) > > The only requirements you need is that the disks need to be SATA and 2.5" > form > factor. Other than that, anything should work. > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab > > From lr at pcorp.us Thu Oct 23 13:31:09 2025 From: lr at pcorp.us (Regina Obe) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:31:09 -0400 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34306] Disks specification for osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <002601dc2bce$a19ed2b0$e4dc7810$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <000e01dc445b$f779a750$e66cf5f0$@pcorp.us> > Hi all > > This the option Regina found: > https://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-Inch-Internal-MZ-77E1T0B- > AM/dp/B08QB93S6R/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2GY3TIQOCCXY4&th=1 > > We would use size 2TB disks: $186 * 6 = $1116 Will give us 12TB space which > I think will be at least 6TB of usable space (RAID would take the other 6TB) > Keep in mind we are throwing out osgeo3 and osgeo4 (which has all the > backups, staging) So we do need the space > > Please let me know your comments > > Regards > Vicky > My only concern is what Grant mentioned https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2025-September/016865.html that these disks are really not meant for server use and that we should look for Pro or Data Center editions disks from resellers. I'm not sure of reliable resellers though and an unreliable one is probably worse than getting not optimal disks. Grant, You have any thoughts on good resellers. I don't think we want to spend more than $2000 on these disks Given we might not have use for this server after a year or so. Thanks, Regina From lnicola at dend.ro Thu Oct 23 13:39:18 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 23:39:18 +0300 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34306] Disks specification for osgeo6 In-Reply-To: <000e01dc445b$f779a750$e66cf5f0$@pcorp.us> References: <002601dc2bce$a19ed2b0$e4dc7810$@pcorp.us> <000e01dc445b$f779a750$e66cf5f0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: <1bd495d9-a731-49d6-bf35-f4c223bfdc7a@app.fastmail.com> Are our current drives enterprise models? On Thu, Oct 23, 2025, at 23:31, Regina Obe wrote: > My only concern is what Grant mentioned > > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2025-September/016865.html > > that these disks are really not meant for server use and that we should > look for Pro or Data > Center editions disks from resellers. From support at osuosl.org Thu Oct 23 14:44:45 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (Lance Albertson via RT) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:44:45 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34306] Disks specification for osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <002601dc2bce$a19ed2b0$e4dc7810$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: On Thu Oct 23 13:07:57 2025, vicky at erosion.dev wrote: > Hi all > > This the option Regina found: > https://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-Inch-Internal-MZ-77E1T0B-AM/dp/B08QB93S6R/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2GY3TIQOCCXY4&th=1 > > We would use size 2TB disks: $186 * 6 = $1116 > Will give us 12TB space which I think will be at least 6TB of usable space > (RAID would take the other 6TB) > > Keep in mind we are throwing out osgeo3 and osgeo4 (which has all the backups, > staging) So we do need the space > > Please let me know your comments Looks good from my point of view. -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab From vicky at erosion.dev Thu Oct 23 14:45:10 2025 From: vicky at erosion.dev (Vicky Vergara) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:45:10 -0600 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> <002201dc41cf$d70818a0$851849e0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: Hello Lance Please go ahead to shutdown osgeo5 (backup) and wipe the disk and send it to surplus Also osgeo6 can be shut down. The disks can be wiped and removed. We are currently looking for the appropriate disks for osgeo6. Maybe remove the disks when you install the new ones. Regards Vicky On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 8:51?AM Lance Albertson via RT wrote: > On Mon Oct 20 07:43:16 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > > Thanks for the heads up. What are your plans for these machines moving > > > forward? > > > > Osgeo6 we are still reviewing disk replacement options and pricing. > > Osgeo5 we plan to throw away. > > > > Have you started moving to the new datacenter? We weren't sure if it's > easier > > for you to do the replacement once you move over osgeo6 or after. > > > > We don't plan to put anything on osgeo6 until it's been moved to its new > home. > > We haven't started moving but I'm hoping that will happen within the next > month. > We're working out some final admin details with the new location. It's > really up > to you with how the move might impact the service eventually being hosted > on the > new system. I don't think it will be a problem if we go ahead and get it > setup > sooner than later since I don't think we'll be ready to move in for at > least > another month. > > Let me know when you're completely done with osgeo5 so we can wipe the > disks and > see if there's any more use we can get out of it. Otherwise, we'll send it > to > surplus if that's okay with you. > > Thanks- > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From support at osuosl.org Thu Oct 23 14:45:36 2025 From: support at osuosl.org (vicky@erosion.dev via RT) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:45:36 -0700 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34471] Shutting down osgeo5 and osgeo6 In-Reply-To: References: <000001dc4099$ece5cf50$c6b16df0$@pcorp.us> <002201dc41cf$d70818a0$851849e0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: Hello Lance Please go ahead to shutdown osgeo5 (backup) and wipe the disk and send it to surplus Also osgeo6 can be shut down. The disks can be wiped and removed. We are currently looking for the appropriate disks for osgeo6. Maybe remove the disks when you install the new ones. Regards Vicky On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 8:51?AM Lance Albertson via RT wrote: > On Mon Oct 20 07:43:16 2025, lr at pcorp.us wrote: > > > Thanks for the heads up. What are your plans for these machines moving > > > forward? > > > > Osgeo6 we are still reviewing disk replacement options and pricing. > > Osgeo5 we plan to throw away. > > > > Have you started moving to the new datacenter? We weren't sure if it's > easier > > for you to do the replacement once you move over osgeo6 or after. > > > > We don't plan to put anything on osgeo6 until it's been moved to its new > home. > > We haven't started moving but I'm hoping that will happen within the next > month. > We're working out some final admin details with the new location. It's > really up > to you with how the move might impact the service eventually being hosted > on the > new system. I don't think it will be a problem if we go ahead and get it > setup > sooner than later since I don't think we'll be ready to move in for at > least > another month. > > Let me know when you're completely done with osgeo5 so we can wipe the > disks and > see if there's any more use we can get out of it. Otherwise, we'll send it > to > surplus if that's okay with you. > > Thanks- > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab > > From osgeo at firefishy.com Thu Oct 23 16:28:31 2025 From: osgeo at firefishy.com (Grant Slater) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:28:31 +0300 Subject: [support.osuosl.org #34306] Disks specification for osgeo6 In-Reply-To: <000e01dc445b$f779a750$e66cf5f0$@pcorp.us> References: <002601dc2bce$a19ed2b0$e4dc7810$@pcorp.us> <000e01dc445b$f779a750$e66cf5f0$@pcorp.us> Message-ID: On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 23:31, Regina Obe wrote: > Grant, > > You have any thoughts on good resellers. I don't think we want to spend more than $2000 on these disks > Given we might not have use for this server after a year or so. > Do you NEED SATA or SAS? There are quite a few Samsung 860 Pro SATA disks available on ebay. I've bought from this reseller in the past and they seem reputable: https://www.ebay.com/itm/389095763994 The remaining endurance / write capacity is important, unfortunately not stated by listing. Firmware easily available, but may need to flashed from ISO when connected to SATA controller (not hardware RAID) They also have larger Samsung disks, but no direct experience with this model: https://www.ebay.com/itm/387212089739 Firmware is harder to find, but few forums have links. Kind regards, Grant From lnicola at dend.ro Fri Oct 24 23:31:03 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:31:03 +0300 Subject: Test with A record Message-ID: <10938e36-1a29-459d-b3a0-1bcd9d54eb69@betaapp.fastmail.com> Just checking, see https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3459. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maplabs at light42.com Sat Oct 25 06:54:40 2025 From: maplabs at light42.com (Brian M Hamlin) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 06:54:40 -0700 Subject: Test with A record In-Reply-To: <10938e36-1a29-459d-b3a0-1bcd9d54eb69@betaapp.fastmail.com> References: <10938e36-1a29-459d-b3a0-1bcd9d54eb69@betaapp.fastmail.com> Message-ID: <3f66a968-1189-bd7e-cfe4-3ab90144c506@light42.com> desktop Thunderbird Reply-List does this On 10/24/25 23:31, Lauren?iu Nicola via Sac wrote: > Just checking, see https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3459. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lnicola at dend.ro Sat Oct 25 08:07:21 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 18:07:21 +0300 Subject: Test with A record In-Reply-To: <3f66a968-1189-bd7e-cfe4-3ab90144c506@light42.com> References: <10938e36-1a29-459d-b3a0-1bcd9d54eb69@betaapp.fastmail.com> <3f66a968-1189-bd7e-cfe4-3ab90144c506@light42.com> Message-ID: Looks good to me! On Sat, Oct 25, 2025, at 16:54, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > desktop Thunderbird Reply-List does this > > On 10/24/25 23:31, Lauren?iu Nicola via Sac wrote: >> Just checking, see https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3459. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lnicola at dend.ro Tue Oct 28 00:21:12 2025 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:21:12 +0200 Subject: Header rewriting enabled for local messages Message-ID: <4854a6c2-54af-443d-a042-4c2fb972abe5@betaapp.fastmail.com> Heads-up: I enabled header rewriting for mynetworks in the Postfix config, which seems to help with the missing Message-IDs. Please prod me if email sending appears to be broken. Laurentiu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: