osgeo4 deployment mismatch with Ansible

'Sandro Santilli' strk at kbt.io
Fri Oct 3 09:57:50 PDT 2025


On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 04:43:31AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> >
> > How's ansible-dev supposed to be different from ansible-control ?
> > Could we just rename it to be in agreement with Ansible ?
> 
> I don't know what ansible-control  is.  Is that something you created?

It came into ansible-deployment 2 years ago:
https://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/e62d15fd3cd982c17550024fd6746cf2c1b10153

and was tweaked again first to allow for nesting:
https://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/6c5a85abc9fc996787133237f439e484568face7

and than to be for debian-12:
https://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/35df8371eb0955af84060fed77708f5511f02d2f

> I setup ansible-dev to work on ansible and it has my home account and
> password key on it and configured just the way I want it.

Check out deployment/roles/osgeo4/tasks/main.yml - how about we rename your ansible-dev to
ansible-control and check that deploying tag container_ansible of osgeo4 role doesn't introduce any change ?

> Too difficult to do ansible work on my desktop.

Yes I remember this, it's probably the main reason why ansible-control was planned

--strk;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20251003/7eec635f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Sac mailing list