osgeo4 deployment mismatch with Ansible

Sandro Santilli strk at kbt.io
Fri Sep 26 08:28:10 PDT 2025


Preparing to add the new mail server container to the set of backed up
containers I found out that the "osgeo4" state is not the one
requested by our Ansible based playbook.

This is how to check:

    make check-osgeo4 ANSIBLE_CONFIG=ansible.osgeo.prod.cfg

The command above shows a few changes that would be made to the
running system and I wonder which of them are really wanted and
which are not, these are:

  x. Backup scripts would change 

     The version of the backup scripts on osgeo4 is different
     from the version in ansible. Weird enough, the version on
     the machine contains a comment stating "Managed via ansible"
     while the version in ansible does NOT have the comment.
     Moreover, there's a git repository on the root dir of osgeo4
     but only partially containing  the /backup dir and having
     local changes on that partially covered set.
     Shall I update ansible to match production ?

  x. An "ansible-control" container would be created

     On the host we have both "ansible-dev" and "ansible-dev-old"
     containers, and BOTH are in RUNNING state, shall I drop them
     both and let the ansible playbook do its thing ?

  x. The "osgeo4-nginx" container would get proxied 140.211.15.32:8081

     The proxy name would be "proxyportacme", suggesting this was for
     LetsEncrypt, but I don't think letsencrypt uses port 8081 and the
     current server is NOT proxying it,
     shall I drop that from the playbook ?
     NOTE: this was probably added by accident in an unrelated commit:
           http://gitea.osgeo.org/sac/ansible-deployment/commit/23dadaf4c
           ( addition of add-download2.yml is also an accident ? )
     
--strk;

  Libre GIS consultant/developer 🎺
  https://strk.kbt.io/services.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20250926/af308398/attachment.sig>


More information about the Sac mailing list