pretalx staging moved to osgeo8

[Regina Obe]

Vicky,

 

I think pretalx-staging-2 was the one that I had created from production to fix the issue with public voting.   I think all of Luca’s efforts to upgrade to PostgreSQL are in the original pretalx-staging.

 

But lets hold off on deleting either.  At a glance it looks like we can expand osgeo8 an extra 1TB. I’ll do that later today.

 

From: Vicky Vergara <vicky at erosion.dev> 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2026 12:01 PM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: pretalx staging moved to osgeo8

 

Hi Luca

 

While moving containers from osgeo4 (EOL in a couple of days) to osgeo8 I noticed there are two staging containers:

pretalx-staging    -- is running and does not have nginx configuration

pretalx-staging-2  -- has nginx configuration

 

As we only less than 1T on osgeo8 and its going to be used also for our backups:

I will not restart pretalx-staging

Please confirm that the one you are using for your tests is: pretalx-staging-2

If that is the case, I will remove pretalx-staging and rename pretalx-staging-2 to eliminate the number suffix.

 

ticket 3540

 

https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3540

Regards

Vicky 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20260313/589b24dc/attachment-0001.htm>