migrating trac instance to gitea

[Markus Neteler]

Am 06.09.26 um 8:53 PM schrieb Regina Obe:
>> Hi all: as part of the ongoing discussions at the OSGeo Board concerning
>> OSGeo services provisioning, we realize and strongly support the gitea
>> instance at [1], as a modern, Git-based version control, issue tracker and wiki
>> for the OSGeo community.  In addition, it would be valuable to streamline this
>> capability and reduce services providing similar functionality.
>>
>> Having said this, we would want to decommission the Trac instance [2] in lieu
>> of gitea, and discuss its implementations with you before initiating a Board
>> motion.
>>
>> Can SAC enumerate projects currently using the instance, and whether gitea
>> could serve their needs instead?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ..Tom
>>
>> [1]https://git.osgeo.org
>> [2]https://trac.osgeo.org
>
> PostGIS , OSGeo, OSGEO4W I think are the prime users of trac.
>
> For the wiki piece of PostGIS we have been migrating the wiki part to our website and are largely done with that.
> I think the trac ticketing piece will take a bit more time but is on our PostGIS roadmap to do.
>
> OSGeo I think is doable.
>
> In all cases it's the level of effort to migrate the tickets and see if we can keep the same numbering.
>
> Grass I think still uses it for some things but not sure.

GRASS uses esp. the old tickets on trac for reference.
We would be very grateful to see the GRASS trac instance migrated as well.

Thanks
Markus


>
> The others it's just a historical history of old tickets that may not have been migrated to github.
>

-- 
Markus Neteler, PhD
https://www.mundialis.de - Earth. Data. Solutions.
https://esmeralda.earth - ecosystem restoration
https://grass.osgeo.org
https://neteler.org/blog
https://www.linkedin.com/in/markusneteler/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/attachments/20260907/d9b7c285/attachment.htm>