[OSGeo-Standards] Fwd: Fw: [geo-discuss] INSPIRE Draft Implementing Rules for Discovery and View Services

[Piergiorgio Cipriano]

(sorry for cross-posting)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Piergiorgio Cipriano <pg.cipriano at gmail.com>
Date: 4-feb-2008 14.45
Subject: Re: Fw: [geo-discuss] INSPIRE Draft Implementing Rules for
Discovery and View Services
To: "jo at frot.org" <jo at frot.org>
Cc: standards at lists.osgeo.org, geonetwork-devel at lists.sourceforge.net,
sfkeller at gmail.com


Jo (+ all),
have you ever had a look at the following reports:

Spatial Data Instrastructure Unit - Scientific Reports
http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/367.html


1)
Services State of Play - Compliance Testing and Interoperability
Checking - EUR 23049
http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/fileadmin/Documentation/Reports/Spatial_Data_infrastructures/EUR_2006-2007/EUR_23049_EN.pdf

2)
Metadata State of Play - Compliance Testing and Interoperability
Checking - EUR 23036
http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/fileadmin/Documentation/Reports/Spatial_Data_infrastructures/EUR_2006-2007/EUR_23036_EN.pdf

3)
Software For Distributed Metadata Catalogue Services to Support The EU
Portal - EUR 22337
http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/fileadmin/Documentation/Reports/Spatial_Data_infrastructures/EUR_2006-2007/EUR_22337_EN.pdf

pg



2008/1/30, jo at frot.org <jo at frot.org>:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:53:48PM +0100, Piergiorgio Cipriano wrote:
> >    Jo, have you already started with organic vegetables?
>
> :) No, instead I spent a day or two reading everything on the blogosphere
> about the scandal over the DIS2950/OOXML vote, wrote a long rant
> http://frot.org/on_standards/ and let myself forget about it for a while.
>
> >    http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Response_to_INSPIRE_Discovery_and_View_Draft
> >    I've updated it, re-formatting existing comments in a "Inspire-like"
> >    table.
>
> Thankyou! I've been writing an OpenSearch-based alternative interface
> for an INSPIRE discovery service and have some notes backed up.
> I will try to make sure i contribute anything i have to the Response
> by the 14th.
>
> >    Actually, I'd like to collect your comments on SOAP and other issues and
> >    forward them to CEN TC 287 WG5 (i'm involved in): this WG is the only
> >    active at CEN level, and it is responsible for acceptance/refusal of
> >    ISO19100 standards at EN level.
>
> I have nothing worth saying about SOAP/REST for OGC web services.
> The GeoServer community has held off from implementing SOAP in the past.
> A couple of posts to the bigger OSGeo lists haven't gathered much
> feedback on the subject of SOAP interfaces to 'view services' on
> client and server. (WFS, WMS). It might be worth emailing project
> maintainers / PSCs personally to find strong opinions or usage data
> that it would be helpful to share with the Commission and CEN.
> I would be quite happy to ping the relevant PSC chairs and ask.
>
> Arnulf is a lot more au fait with "The State Of..." than me, i think.
>
> >    WG5 2008-2009 activities are:
> >    - prEN 19128, 19131, 19137 votes (next week)
> >    - votes on other ISO docs (in april: DIS19115-2)
> >    - update TR15449 (Geographic information - Standards, specifications,
> >    technical reports and guidelines, required to implement Spatial Data
> >    Infrastructure)
> >    - profiling EN-ISO19100 standards and supporting Inspire DTs
>
> Thanks for keeping us updated, and good luck!
>
>
> jo
>
>


--

Piergiorgio Cipriano
pg.cipriano at gmail.com

("perchè la terra dei cachi è la terra dei cachi ..!")


-- 

Piergiorgio Cipriano
pg.cipriano at gmail.com

("perchè la terra dei cachi è la terra dei cachi ..!")