[OSGeo-Standards] Re: [WMS.RWG] Let's talk about OSGEO tiled
solutions and try to integrate them in WMS and WMTS documents.
prushfor at NRCan.gc.ca
Fri Feb 22 10:45:56 EST 2008
> > The REST approach of the OSGeo proposal, however elegant, is
> > incompatible with much of the OGC way of doing things.
> Step back, reword, take the outside perspective:
> "The approach of the OGC proposal, however streamlined to OGC
> ways of doing things, is incompatible with much of the REST
> of the world."
Edison's and Tesla's approaches to electricity distribution
were incompatible, too. They had different characteristics,
and were both valuable for different reasons. One prevailed,
which has led to a long period of stability (at least from
the consumer perspective), and innovation, in electricity-consuming
devices. The same may be turn out true for geography-consuming
> > between services so that they can be smoothly integrated and so that
> > single core set of libraries can be utilized in the implementation
> > several services (rather than having a completely separate and
> > redundant code base for each service).
> This is a narrow approach in that it suggests that all
> libraries should be good for all OGC specs. I do not think
> so, this is the danger of standards preventing innovation.
Innovation and evolution could still happen inside the consuming device.
More information about the Standards