[OSGeo-Standards] What terms should go into an OSGeo Glossary?
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Sat Sep 28 14:40:07 PDT 2019
** Forwarding Ron's email while email subscription details get sorted
out. **
On 28/9/19 10:50 pm, Ronald Tse wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> Thank you for the multiple attempts to help post this message :-)
>
> And congratulations on coming up with a good new term! (“Doochracy"
> may not even need the hyphen, similar to cooperation.)
>
> 1. If we can get a consensus that osgeo.geolexica.org
> <http://osgeo.geolexica.org> (or any other domain you control/prefer)
> is a good idea, we can start something right away.
>
> 2. In terms of content, this is a sample of the concept data structure
> / fields entered into Geolexica:
>
> (rendered as https://www.geolexica.org/concepts/212/)
>
> term: geometric complex
> termid: 212
> eng:
> id: 212
> term: geometric complex
> definition: set of disjoint geometric primitives where the boundary
> of each geometric
> primitive can be represented as the union of other geometric
> primitives of smaller
> dimension within the same set
> language_code: eng
> notes:
> - The geometric primitives in the set are disjoint in the sense that
> no direct position
> is interior to more than one geometric primitive. The set is
> closed under boundary
> operations, meaning that for each element in the geometric
> complex, there is a
> collection (also a geometric complex) of geometric primitives that
> represents
> the boundary of that element. Recall that the boundary of a point
> (the only 0D
> primitive object type in geometry) is empty. Thus, if the largest
> dimension geometric
> primitive is a solid (3D), the composition of the boundary
> operator in this definition
> terminates after at most three steps. It is also the case that the
> boundary of
> any object is a cycle.
> examples: []
> entry_status: valid
> classification: preferred
> review_indicator: ''
> authoritative_source:
> ref: ISO 19107:2003
> link: https://www.iso.org/standard/26012.html
> <https://www.iso.org/standard/26012.html>
> date_accepted: 2003-05-01 00:00:00.000000000 +08:00
> release: ‘1'
>
> Keep in mind that the definition / examples / notes can contain rich
> text, such as math equations, graphics, lists, etc.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Ron
>
> _____________________________________
>
> Ronald Tse
> Ribose Inc.
>
> +=========================================================+
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to
> receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,
> disclose or take any action based on this message or any
> information herein. If you have received this message in
> error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
> and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
> +=========================================================+
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20190929/8daef7cf/attachment.html>
More information about the Standards
mailing list