[OSGeo-Standards] What terms should go into an OSGeo Glossary?

Cameron Shorter cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Sat Sep 28 14:40:07 PDT 2019


** Forwarding Ron's email while email subscription details get sorted 
out. **

On 28/9/19 10:50 pm, Ronald Tse wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> Thank you for the multiple attempts to help post this message :-)
>
> And congratulations on coming up with a good new term! (“Doochracy" 
> may not even need the hyphen, similar to cooperation.)
>
> 1. If we can get a consensus that osgeo.geolexica.org 
> <http://osgeo.geolexica.org> (or any other domain you control/prefer) 
> is a good idea, we can start something right away.
>
> 2. In terms of content, this is a sample of the concept data structure 
> / fields entered into Geolexica:
>
> (rendered as https://www.geolexica.org/concepts/212/)
>
> term: geometric complex
> termid: 212
> eng:
>   id: 212
>   term: geometric complex
>   definition: set of disjoint geometric primitives where the boundary 
> of each geometric
>     primitive can be represented as the union of other geometric 
> primitives of smaller
>     dimension within the same set
>   language_code: eng
>   notes:
>   - The geometric primitives in the set are disjoint in the sense that 
> no direct position
>     is interior to more than one geometric primitive. The set is 
> closed under boundary
>     operations, meaning that for each element in the geometric 
> complex, there is a
>     collection (also a geometric complex) of geometric primitives that 
> represents
>     the boundary of that element. Recall that the boundary of a point 
> (the only 0D
>     primitive object type in geometry) is empty. Thus, if the largest 
> dimension geometric
>     primitive is a solid (3D), the composition of the boundary 
> operator in this definition
>     terminates after at most three steps. It is also the case that the 
> boundary of
>     any object is a cycle.
>   examples: []
>   entry_status: valid
>   classification: preferred
>   review_indicator: ''
>   authoritative_source:
>     ref: ISO 19107:2003
>     link: https://www.iso.org/standard/26012.html 
> <https://www.iso.org/standard/26012.html>
>   date_accepted: 2003-05-01 00:00:00.000000000 +08:00
>   release: ‘1'
>
> Keep in mind that the definition / examples / notes can contain rich 
> text, such as math equations, graphics, lists, etc.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Ron
>
> _____________________________________
>
> Ronald Tse
> Ribose Inc.
>
> +=========================================================+
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to
> receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,
> disclose or take any action based on this message or any
> information herein.  If you have received this message in
> error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
> and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.
> +=========================================================+

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20190929/8daef7cf/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list