[Tilecache] IE, memcached

[Soenke J. Peters]

Hi Yves,

Christopher Schmidt schrieb:
> There is nothin faster than file-based caching for TileCache.
> memcached is about 3x slower on server-class disks.

maybe the problem is that the browser fetches the tiles sequentially
instead of getting a bunch of them in parallel.

The usual trick to circumvent this is using aliases for the server name
(e.g. a.tilecache.example.com, b.tilecache.example.com) all pointing to
the same server (e.g. tilecache.example.com).
Have a look at http://openlayers.org/dev/examples/multiserver.html

Bye,
-- 
  ____   Soenke Jan Peters
 |_  _|    22395 Hamburg, Germany
 ._||      E-Mail & Jabber/XMPP: peters at opcenter.de
           WWW: http://opcenter.de, GnuPG Key-ID: 0xF358FDCA