[Ubuntu] Bug#712688: transition: gdal

[Johan Van de Wauw]

At version 1.10 with libgdal1h I mean.

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
<johan.vandewauw at gmail.com> wrote:
> Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight).
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal
>
> Johan
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik <ivan.mincik at gmail.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/22/2013 06:23 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:16:50AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:01:39AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 17:16:03 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Francesco Paolo
>>>>>> Lovergine wrote:
>>>>>>> BTW, without annoying all of you with a so looooooong
>>>>>>> history about this issue, I'm going to introduce a new
>>>>>>> libgdal1h binary package (h means hidden, better
>>>>>>> suggestions are welcome :)), with a new SONAME libgdal.1h
>>>>>>> to manage a decent migration to the new flavor. This will
>>>>>>> sacrifice third-parties sw compatibility, but well, who
>>>>>>> cares? It would be break anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe a better choice in this specific case would be
>>>>>> introducing a new binary package (libgdal1h) that
>>>>>> Conflicts/Breaks against libgdal1 and provides the usual
>>>>>> library with the usual name/soname. Of course, that will
>>>>>> force a lot of bNMUs and an explicit unblocking set to
>>>>>> complete the transition properly. Make sense?
>>>>> I must admit from your mails I don't really understand what
>>>>> your plan is. Do the packages currently in experimental follow
>>>>> that plan?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, at least the still pending in NEW queue (it has a proper
>>>> fix). I would simply provide a new libtary package that provides
>>>> the usual library name/soname and conflicts with the old one.
>>>> That will require a good amount of bNMUs for rdepends.
>>>>
>>>
>>> After a couple of new releases in experimental, it is now time of
>>> pushing this change ASAP in sid. RMs, could you please give an ack
>>> about that? As said, we will need to ask for a long list of bNMUs
>>> after release in sid.
>>>
>>
>> Dear Francesco and Bas, I was trying to read all possible information
>> (bug reports, debian/changelog, mailing list) about the libgdal1h
>> issue and transition, but still, it is not clear for me what the
>> current state is and what it needs to be done to complete this task.
>>
>> Please, could you summarize current situation ? Is it possible that
>> GDAL 10 packaging will be fully completed soon enough to get to Ubuntu
>> 14.04 LTS in best shape ?
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your work.
>>
>> - --
>> Ivan Mincik
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSwtTfAAoJEPfdLsR5UpoewwkH/21PGRkViUY5WcbEANL5J9Ln
>> KP8GXUQU45TDeM+Wlq4VI5XHxDP82Ge+acMl85tjv7Psx2NStWTNHdMhcRGm7r2F
>> T8PO7eV8x6Y7jd3i199FwvzwS6nUtTiu+M/FtS4ekvQxiEP9rNwEdf3XRTfGoDtZ
>> RWjEAIodQeN1ddZE2hFpi2TPxVD9xPik+lDjXh7jDCfrq+8Wslg5PzXJynGHRZKG
>> GLtkvK8o93P2VPrDmp94qa9KclQJ4s5mrjhXH+2FzVfCaJMwVmdSFCUrFLk5wWBs
>> Ebkb3mNANrM7Du3EGdigIchETD7zBQN1jwXsw4++0K1VgwY6ih/k/83maVHwPUU=
>> =Vqtn
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-request at lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster at lists.debian.org
>> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52C2D4DF.5000705@gmail.com
>>