[Ubuntu] Stable update
Randal Hale
rjhale at northrivergeographic.com
Mon Apr 25 10:26:31 PDT 2016
Unstable has always been a bit confusing (at least for me) because we
had "stable" packages in a unstable repo. Maybe you could do a
Stable/Testing or Stable/Unstable. We've only ever had one relevant ppa
and that has been unstable.
/"Install your software from the unstable ppa"//
//"I don't want unstable software"
"That's not what it means"
/Randy/
/
On 04/25/2016 01:15 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-04-24 22:02 GMT+02:00 Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com
> <mailto:gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>>:
>
>
> For the Testing and Unstable repositories, all Ubuntu EOL releases
> were also removed from the archives to save space.
>
>
> I wonder if we really need three repos. Probably two repos - stable
> and testing/unstable would be enough. Martin
>
> --
> Martin Landa
> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UbuntuGIS mailing list
> Ubuntu at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
> http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
--
-----------------
Randal Hale
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjhale at northrivergeographic.com
twitter:rjhale http://about.me/rjhale
http://www.northrivergeographic.com/introduction-to-quantum-gis
https://www.facebook.com/NRGSInc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ubuntu/attachments/20160425/c90efb6d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ubuntu
mailing list