[Ubuntu] GDAL 2.2.0 transition

[Even Rouault]

On jeudi 6 juillet 2017 17:03:44 CEST Stéphane Henriod wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I have made a few tests (mostly focused on the newly added CRS EPSG:7694)
> on Ubuntu 16.04 with QGIS 2.14.14 and GDAL 2.2.0
> 
> When using the Tool Vector - Geoprocessing tools - Difference the
> difference between 2 layers is empty. Using the same tool on the same data
> with the CRS 32643 gives correct results.
> 
> Not sure though if this has to do with GDAL or with the processing tool
> itself? Other tools like Dissolve or Buffer seem to work properly. Here a
> test dataset (in both CRS): https://eba.klink.asia/dms/klink/65bacc/preview
> . The difference [kyrgyzstan_Kyrg06-3] - [rayons_Kyrg06-3] should actually
> give a result
> 
> Haven't seen any other issue so far.

I've run ogrinfo -al shp > log.txt on your dataset with GDAL 2.2 and GDAL 2.1 and get almost 
the same results. The only difference is that GDAL 2.2 now reports the SRS of layers 
kyrgyzstan_UTM43N and rayons_UTM43N with an explicit EPSG:32643 code, which is an 
intended change of GDAL 2.2, and I wouldn't think that would cause issues to QGIS. So my 
feeling is that the issue is more with the processing tool itself, or a subtle issue in the 
integration of QGIS&GDAL.

> 
> Cheers
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2017, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com
> 
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','even.rouault at spatialys.com');>> a écrit :
> >> On mercredi 28 juin 2017 23:45:39 CEST Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> >> > If I understand correctly, 2.2.1 will be released mid this week,
> >> > 
> >> > perhaps it is worth waiting for that and save a transition?
> >> 
> >> 2.2.1 has just been released :
> >> 
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017-June/046836.html
> >> 
> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Angelos Tzotsos
> >> > <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > Any objections to move the packages to Unstable?
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > There was a report in the OTB mailing list about performance issues
> >> 
> >> with
> >> 
> >> > > OTB 6.0 and experimental.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Any feedback on that?
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > Best,
> >> > > 
> >> > > Angelos
> >> > > 
> >> > > On 06/05/2017 01:09 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> >> > >> Hi all,
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> I have just completed the transition to GDAL 2.2.0 for Xenial and
> >> 
> >> have
> >> 
> >> > >> pushed the packages to experimental ppa.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> Please test before we push to unstable.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> Best,
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> Angelos
> >> > > 
> >> > > --
> >> > > 
> >> > > Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
> >> > > 
> >> > > Charter Member
> >> > > 
> >> > > Open Source Geospatial Foundation
> >> > > 
> >> > > http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > 
> >> > > UbuntuGIS mailing list
> >> > > 
> >> > > Ubuntu at lists.osgeo.org
> >> > > 
> >> > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
> >> > > 
> >> > > http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
> >> > 
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > 
> >> > UbuntuGIS mailing list
> >> > 
> >> > Ubuntu at lists.osgeo.org
> >> > 
> >> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
> >> > 
> >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ubuntu/attachments/20170706/38649139/attachment-0001.html>