[Ubuntu] [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?
Johan Van de Wauw
johan.vandewauw at gmail.com
Wed Sep 20 13:56:29 PDT 2017
Hi all,
Sorry for reviving an old discussion, but I was in need of a recent
gdal package today for travis. I have added this to my own ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~johanvdw/+archive/ubuntu/gdal
Angelos, Bas, do you have a list of gdal dependencies and the order in
which they need to be built? I'm thinking about uploading my packages
to ubuntugis/unstable.
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ari Jolma <ari.jolma at gmail.com> wrote:
> 11.04.2017, 13:28, Bas Couwenberg kirjoitti:
>>
>> On 2017-04-11 12:22, Ari Jolma wrote:
>>>
>>> 11.04.2017, 13:05, Angelos Tzotsos kirjoitti:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ari,
>>>>
>>>> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable
>>>> sudo apt-get update
>>>> sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev
>>>>
>>>> This should do it.
>>>
>>>
>>> No. I tried that before (found it in my .travis.yml file...) and it
>>> pulls in older version 1.10.0.
>>
>>
>> You can install the 2.1.3 version explicitly with:
>>
>> sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev=2.1.3+dfsg-1~xenial2
>
>
> It seems it did not even try this. Probably because it is precise?
>
>>
>> But this will fail when the version is updated in the PPA.
>>
>> Is the travis environment using Ubuntu xenial, and not an older LTS like
>> trusty or precise? It's probably trusty since that ships with GDAL 1.10.1.
>
>
> It is precise. Trusty build environment is in beta.
>
>
>>
>> For those older LTS releases the UbuntuGIS packages haven't been updated
>> yet. Depending on manpower and motivation we may be able to updated the
>> trusty packages in the near future.
>
>
> It would save a lot of build time at least for me.
>
> The reason for me is that many of my project use the GDAL Perl bindings and
> for the tests I pull in the latest from CPAN, which is based on the latest
> released GDAL.
>
>>
>> Ideally the travis environment is upgraded to xenial for which the best
>> support is available and the default packages in Ubuntu itself are much more
>> current.
>
>
> ok
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ari
>
>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Bas
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
More information about the Ubuntu
mailing list