[Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] Where 2.0 brainstorming

[Chris Holmes]

I think we should definitely use the half day workshop spot.  I can do 
GeoServer stuff really easily since we already have that all written 
out.  And I'm happy to volunteer at the booth.

Chris

Tyler Mitchell wrote:
> I've been working on Location Intelligence - need to finalise some more 
> speaker titles, etc. and decide if we want to use the half day workshop 
> spot we have and to hussle people to help at booth.  
> 
> Autodesk will donate booth space but we need to figure out budgets, etc. 
> so we can get new booth material/posters, etc. through OSGeo funds.
> 
> I think we're looking pretty good for this event so far with the work 
> I've done, but we need booth stuff and volunteer rallying mainly.
> 
> Tyler
> 
> On 25-Jan-07, at 2:42 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> 
>> I can spare some ergs in the next few days for event stuff -- but not 
>> sure if I should try and resume our contacts with the Where gang, or 
>> should we do anyhting about Location Intelligence instead?
>>  
>> -mpg
>>  
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     *From:* viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>     [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Tyler
>>     Mitchell
>>     *Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:40 AM
>>     *To:* Visibility Committee Discussion List
>>     *Subject:* Re: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] Where 2.0
>>     brainstorming
>>
>>     I have not been in touch with them lately, but someone really
>>     needs to.  I think having an interoperability demo-fest would be a
>>     great way for us to engage with each other.  I'm seeing this
>>     opportunity forming more and more and is something I think OSGeo +
>>     OGC can really take the lead on.
>>
>>     Aside from that I really want to follow up with our opportunities
>>     with Where 2.0 organisers directly, but have been too swamped. 
>>     Anyone else out there who would like to coordinate it?  I have
>>     some ideas, but not much time at present to be effective in making
>>     them happen.
>>
>>     Tyler
>>
>>     On 24-Jan-07, at 4:38 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
>>
>>>     Tyler, et al:
>>>      
>>>     OGC/Raj is wondering what to do at Where 2.0.
>>>      
>>>     I know I'm way out of the loop on this, but have we talked with
>>>     the Where folk lately?
>>>      
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Viscom-dev mailing list
>> Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/viscom-dev
> 
> !DSPAM:1003,45b946dc144454750375898!
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Viscom-dev mailing list
> Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/viscom-dev
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:1003,45b946dc144454750375898!

-- 
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cholmes.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 282 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/viscom-dev/attachments/20070125/9b31a435/cholmes.vcf